47
submitted 1 year ago by iraq_lobster@lemm.ee to c/science@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] randomname01@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

I swear we’ll do anything but actually try to consume a bit less. It’d be cool if we’d find some magic solution, but all of this feels like trying a way to enable our total overconsumption.

[-] JWBananas@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Corporations have been pushing the sustainability-is-a-personal-responsibility narrative for decades. But even in the best case, it only makes a drop-in-the-bucket difference compared to solutions that work at massive scale.

"What is your carbon footprint?" I don't know. What is Walmart's?

On top of that, there are billions of people who are either currently living in poverty or are finally on their way to tasting the prosperity that much of the Western world has had for the last century. Will our cuts in consumption be enough to outweigh the increases by everyone else? Even if we break even, that still leaves us on the way to disaster.

There is no silver bullet. The more realistic scalable solutions we can synergistically use to achieve sustainability, the better.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
47 points (98.0% liked)

Science

13160 readers
3 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS