938

Google has reportedly removed much of Twitter's links from its search results after the social network's owner Elon Musk announced reading tweets would be limited.

Search Engine Roundtable found that Google had removed 52% of Twitter links since the crackdown began last week. Twitter now blocks users who are not logged in and sets limits on reading tweets.

According to Barry Schwartz, Google reported 471 million Twitter URLs as of Friday. But by Monday morning, that number had plummeted to 227 million.

"For normal indexing of these Twitter URLs, it seems like these tweets are dropping out of the sky," Schwartz wrote.

Platformer reported last month that Twitter refused to pay its bill for Google Cloud services.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] darkevilmac@vlemmy.net 27 points 1 year ago

I feel like Google is going to have to find a way to effectively index federated content at some point. The only way to really get human information is from sites like Reddit and Twitter. And both of those platforms seem to be dedicated to completely imploding at the moment.

[-] FlagonOfMe@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago

There's nothing about the content being federated that makes it hard or impossible to index. Each instance is just a website with a public webpage that a bot can read. That all a search engine needs to index it. The worst case scenario is the bot will find the same content on multiple instances.

I did read that the website is loaded entirely through JavaScript and that maybe the Google bot doesn't execute JavaScript so can't see the text. I don't know if that's still a problem in 2023, though.

This article says it's not a problem, but I didn't read past the tl;dr, so maybe there's a caveat. Like maybe it has to use a popular framework like React or something to work.

https://searchengineland.com/tested-googlebot-crawls-javascript-heres-learned-220157

[-] void_wanderer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Googlebot does execute Javascript, but since rendering JS needs much more resources, JS crawling will happen significantly less then simple http crawling. That's why all big sites still return server side rendered content.

[-] darkevilmac@vlemmy.net 2 points 1 year ago

Rendering with JS definitely makes a difference, it's part of the reason SSR is such a big deal for SEO.

[-] lightrush@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago
[-] varsock@programming.dev 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

duckduckgo (who uses Microsoft's index I believe) is able to find Lemmy instances already.

problem is since every instance has its own domain you cannot search all of Lemmy or the more obscure fediverse. lemmy.world, beehaw.org, programming.dev are all different "websites".

I append "reddit" to my query when I want to search reddit for a human answer to a question. Can't do that with Lemmy, unless the instance is branded as Lemmy.

Unless there will be an org or volunteers that indexes federated instances and makes them available to search engines to they can be differentiated, finding stuff in the fediverse might be difficult...

[-] Marxine@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Would be lovely if we could just start a search with fedi: or activityPub:

[-] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Fuck Google, if Lemmy continues to take off we can just develop better search tools within the fediverse. The wider internet has been colonized, the path forward cannot rely on big tech corporations.

I'm not a programmer/developer so I don't even understand the scale of the work that has yet to be done. But I am deeply committed to upsetting the status quo, and this platform feels distinctly revolutionary. Can't wait to see what the future holds for Lemmy.

[-] darkevilmac@vlemmy.net 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's all well and good to have a revolution, but if nobody knows you're having one then nothing really changes. There are still benefits to centralised services, one of which being scale. To effectively index so much data you need scale, which is why smaller search engines tend to be just white labels of things like Bing.

[-] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

100k people isn't nobody. Centralized services can be useful at times, but there is no fundamental law preventing a decentralized system from providing the same functionality.

The value of indexing data drops drastically when much of that data is junk, as is the case in the wider internet. Because Lemmy is a federation, there is a built in system to filter the junk.

[-] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago
[-] bloopernova@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

I want a federated wiki. But bad actors resistant somehow.

[-] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Lol nice. The pace of development of Lemmy is unreal. I've only been here a month and it's already so much easier to use than in the beginning.

[-] DM_ME_SQUIRRELS@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Isn't it automatically indexed? I mean, I can go to lemmy.world in a browser and see the content, wouldn't Google's indexing bots do the same?

[-] zuccs@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It already is.

Just put ‘site:lemmy.world’ into Google to see what it has indexed on that instance for example. I don’t think Lemmy is optimised for search yet, but I saw some GitHub threads around the topic.

[-] DM_ME_SQUIRRELS@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Isn't it automatically indexed? I mean, I can go to lemmy.world in a browser and see the content, wouldn't Google's indexing bots do the same?

[-] ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

You can tell from how many upvotes this has that there are just as many idiots here as on reddit lol

Google can definitely index Lemmy

[-] Feweroptions@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago

Honestly, and I hate this, but I doubt they will. The majority of people will never go federated, even though it's so easy, because they suck.

[-] TempleSquare@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

It's the difference between a mom and pop restaurant and McDonald's.

We don't need everybody to go to the mom and pop restaurant. Just enough of us to keep it afloat.

[-] Marxine@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

People at large really need to remember not every kind of growth is good: it has to be sustainable, and only happen until where it's needed.

Unlimited growth is basically cancer, and that's what big corpos feel to society tbh.

[-] Vohki@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago
[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

That sleeping giant has woken up. And it has morning wood.

this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
938 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

60003 readers
2524 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS