57
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by TinyTimmyTokyo@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems

Rationalist check-list:

  1. Incorrect use of analogy? Check.
  2. Pseudoscientific nonsense used to make your point seem more profound? Check.
  3. Tortured use of probability estimates? Check.
  4. Over-long description of a point that could just have easily been made in 1 sentence? Check.

This email by SBF is basically one big malapropism.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] swlabr@awful.systems 8 points 1 year ago

Alts for SBF’s usage of “uncanny valley” he can have for free if he promises not to use “uncanny valley” incorrectly ever again:

  • amiss abyss
  • stench trench
  • uncomfortable gorge/fjord
  • communication fail vale
  • canyon of “can you meet me in the middle”

It’s 100 BTC if he wants to keep misusing it though.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
57 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

1003 readers
38 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS