110
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
110 points (95.1% liked)
Technology
58137 readers
4303 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The issue is the opposite, because people use non official communication channels it's hard for regulators to get the information they need, and it can be taken as the bank hiding things, which leads to fines. It's in the article:
They could claim it's for easier reporting by dropping WhatsApp, getting rid of texts is blatantly about preventing paper trails.
How to tell me you haven’t read the opening paragraph of the article.
Spoilers: WhatsApp is already banned
Which is exactly what the comment you’re replying to is saying. Dropping WhatsApp improves reporting, dropping texts alongside it is just suspicious.
The irony.
Are you not able to open the article and read it?
I did, you did not read what I wrote.