If the police lose, you really lose
HeartyBeast
joined 2 years ago
It’s not at all weird and very easy to explain. The BBC positions itself as an impartial reporter. Anything that appears to be a judgement call by someone else is (quite rightly) put into quotes.
In this case, I would have simply left out the words “innocent victim “ myself, as it’s a bit odd - but that is the rationale.
If your organisation is big enough to have a press office of more than 4 or 5 people, you will usually have an on-call rota.
Sentencing July 11 - delayed because the original date would clash with a court appearance in Florida
Let’s go clubbing
Certainly, if you on an ‘agile’ tariff in the UK it can be a lot cheaper. There were times a few month ago when it was particularly windy - they were paying me to use electricity/charge my solar batteries from the grid.
For me the headline was drowned out by the sound of Beavis and Butthead laughter
Very good explanation of the situation here: https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/tools-and-resources/fthr/pest-and-disease-resources/oak-processionary-moth-thaumetopoea-processionea/
I wonder how many manufacturers can currently manage that.
24
Revealed: how touts drew up secret plans to sabotage Labour’s ticket reforms
(www.theguardian.com)
Not bad. Did the Ride London 60 on Sunday, pondering whether I should try the 100 next year. It went ok
However, the upside is that there are no bots, dark patterns, or manipulated feeds.
There’s a huge amount of incoming spam, much of it, I suspect posted by bots. I’ve also seen account posting ‘news’ from sites that are clearly AI generated
@streaming21 has been spamming the fediverse magazine with movie links What is the best way to get a particular rogue account looked at?
view more: next ›
Pretty sure AP is funded by newspapers