0
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 May 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)
GenZedong
4302 readers
18 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
I seen few funny moments in polish TV when some more nerdy anticommunist goes on a rants about "Żdanowszczyzna" and the more casual anticommunists are completely disoriented "What the fuck he is even talking about, who that Zhdanov guy even was" and when the talk is back into the usual mantras of Stalin bad, there is visible relax getting back in their muscles and faces.
I first learned about Zhdanov and Zhdanovschina in the context of Testimony: The Unpublished Memoirs of Dmitri Shostakovich (a very tendentious and, according to even liberal scholars, very likely fabricated tome). Even within that context Zhdanov seemed based, with all criticisms of him basically reducing to "he didn't let famous artists form a clique where they would just throw paint at the wall and then mock common people for not 'getting it,' this is SO TYRANNICAL!"
I don't really know what to think of him. Letting aside the cultural crackdown which seems incredibly overblown he seems to have equal numbers of successes and based moments to failures.
I think most notable was his original idea of appointing experts to high posts - at that moment in history most likely a mistake, especially with all the Lenin's writing about them being used as arguments against. Then again maybe not that much since a lot of time passed and it might be safer... especially safer than Khrushchev. Also, China right now does exactly this with a great successes, as long as the proven comrades are there too - we can say that Zhdanov was a man who went far ahead of his time :D
Zhdanovshchina, especially the point that socialism and capitalism formed two blocks that are in the ideological war with eachother and therefore socialism must not ignore the culture war, is so absolutely obvious, even from back then, that why it wasn't on all the time? Even more, later the socialist block allowed the western soft power in and it was one of main factors in the fall.