124
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

Reagan was an actor, and he was instrumental in the process of fucking up our society to the degree that it is now. He spearheaded deregulation. One of the direct outcomes of that is the rampant increase of wealth inequality, as well as the now-“normal” boom/bust economic economic cycle that started with Black Monday in 1987 and has been getting markedly worse with each crash.

[-] Treczoks@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

That was not because he was an actor. That was because Reagan was stupid enough to listen to the wrong people.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

OP's point is that there is a correlation between celebrity presidents and terrible decisions affecting the nation.

[-] wombatula@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

The sample size is 2, and both of them were terrible people before they got into politics.

Reagan was an authoritarian bootlicker who helped out communists as the President of SAG, he was already a fascist and was voted in because he was a fascist that was good at public speaking.

Not even gonna get into how shitty of a human being Trump was before being president, except to point out he was the biggest voice accusing Obama of faking his birth certificate.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Correct. Third's a charm? Fuck no. No more chances.

[-] wombatula@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Or you know, don't vote for terrible people instead of basing it on what their job was? Just an idea.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

We aren't disagreeing. Celebrities are my exception.

[-] sab@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I think the point is that Schwarzenegger, unlike Reagan, has political experience. He has proven himself not to be as much as a puppet as Reagan was, at least.

That said, good thing he can't run.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

Reagan was also Governor of California before he became president.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

All I really remember from The Governators time was how many parks got built.

It was actually kind of ridiculous because the signs went up into all kinds of places I had been using for hiking for years, dirt lots or unmanaged areas that connected to wilderness. Then bam, sign goes up with a big green ✅ and Swartzennegers name. No park at first just the signs. And a shit ton of them. Like a ridiculous number. It took time from there but they were all eventually turned into parks and green spaces.

He gets a lot of shit because he is an over the top character, but California has done far worse. Newsom is worse. Davis did less.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I actually think he'd do a great job. I just don't think it's likely to happen due to the constitutional requirements, which would never be changed in a normal political environment, much less in this one.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Let's remember that a lot of people think of Trump doing a great job.

Never again.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I mean he was kinda milquetoast, but also, California is like, fucking impossible to manage. I don't think people realize how strange and departed interests are in Sacramento. It's a clusterfuck because California is so variable in its territory, people, and ideologies.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I've appreciated his efforts to use his platform to try to be a voice of reason to other Republicans in recent years. He's flawed, but he's a legit role model with a head on his shoulders.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I've never really understood his fascination with Repubs. He doesn't carry their idealogy. It's kinda weird. He's like a baby swan who the first politician he saw was a Republican and so he's a Republican. He even says as much in some interview.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 year ago

I don't think you understand economics. The economy naturally booms and crashes since the dawn of time.

The key is to slow down the boom and speed up the crash so we don't end up with the economy totally crashing

I am familiar with Keynesian economics. I am not suggesting that regulations fully prevent crashes, either then or now.

What I am saying is that removing the guardrails so you can cut corners even more aggressively in the interest of profit works great until you crash in a way that the guardrails would have made the crash suck a lot less.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago

I'm not familiar with "Keynesian economics". However I do think cutting corners is something that is common with many industries. It isn't because of profit but is more related to the desire not to go out of business. Competition is normally a good thing as it drives down prices while increasing options for customers. The fix to this is to bad behavior with fines or outright bans.

lmao you fucking muppet it’s the foundational ideology to what you’re trying to express. The fact that you freely admitted that you haven’t heard of it is an implicit admission of complete ignorance on the topic you’re attempting to push. Kindly cease attempting to misinform people.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have never heard of "Keynesian economics" until today and I haven't seem any paper, journals or other such media to back your claims. I'm not a professional economist but it seems like you are just following someone or something blindly.

So before you get mad you should look to draw your own conclusions and be familiar with what you are arguing. I my intention wasn't to provoke you. Lemmy is full people stating options and half truths as absolute facts. I'm not guilt free but at least I'm willing to admit my arrogance. Try not to be a gate keeper

I don’t think you understand economics

And then later

Try not to be a gatekeeper

Lol no. I’m not gonna let you just pretend you came out of the gates with a diplomatic tone.

You’re arguing in bad faith. I called you on it, and your response indicates you don’t know what you’re talking about.

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
124 points (85.2% liked)

Interesting Global News

2564 readers
352 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS