22
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Evinceo@awful.systems 9 points 1 year ago

While I love blaming slatescott for things, I do think there's maybe a deeper story to the fascination with addies than slatescott blogging about it once.

A lot of millennials were prescribed stimulants as kids, enough that we have some level of folk knowledge about them. In Adderall Risks he more or less admits to handing them out like candy and he is far from the only (lol ex) psychiatrist to do so.

The article, while clearly endorsing stimulants as a safe nootrooic that everyone should take (and is good for the world now let me munch a few more pills ๐Ÿ’Š), is actually more of an apologia to convince people who are already using stimulants that no harm will come to them. Sure there's the usual amount of discovering an apple pie from scratch new atheist libertarian bloviating that obscures it, but he does that about everything.*

One funny aspect of his 'stimulants are required for modern work' argument is that he's basically endorsing the social model of disability, though more recently he has decided that expressing ableism to own the libs is more important than being correct.

*Except if he wants to sneak in an idea without you thinking about it. Those will usually be the hardcore nrx ones.

[-] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 9 points 1 year ago

more recently he has decided that expressing ableism to own the libs is more important than being correct.

I already know these people are eugenicists who would rather die than think about sociology for one minute, but still I feel the need to say: god what a cunt.

[-] gnomicutterance@hachyderm.io 10 points 1 year ago

Or rather die than come up with good metaphors to attack his shitty strawman. He knows his Everest metaphor is shit -- some summiters are blind or double amputees, and the amount of equipment ableds need to climb everest is *evidence* of the social model -- he backpedals halfway through, but he makes the metaphor anyway! NASA is literally trying to figure out how to design space travel for disabled astronauts, which he'd know if he'd typed two words into google.

He's just... being a cunt.

[-] gnomicutterance@hachyderm.io 9 points 1 year ago

Also the distance between the social model of disability and transhumanism is measured in nanometers, and yet these assholes are so offended that disabled people might be using the enhancements of their eugenicist dystopias.

These motherfuckers.

[-] 200fifty@awful.systems 8 points 1 year ago

"We can transcend the limitations of our physical bodies via technology! Wait, no, not like that!"

[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 11 points 1 year ago

obliterating all the rules of physical existence EXCEPT the ones that help maintain hierarchies they like

[-] korydg@awful.systems 7 points 1 year ago

I have seen the same take rolled out for transgender people as well.

[-] 200fifty@awful.systems 7 points 1 year ago

it's a shame, because gender transition stuff is probably one of the most successful "human biohacking" type things in common use today, and it's also just... really cool. alas, bigotry

[-] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago

B-but submarines aren't wheelchair accessible and I can't imagine alternatives to wheelchairs or different submarines! And I like to think about how my grandmother would die if I stranded her on a desert island! So I must be right! P.S. cars are a natural occurrence!

this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
22 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

1003 readers
1 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS