this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
390 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

76046 readers
3581 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sam Bankman-Fried found guilty on all seven counts::Sam Bankman-Fried, the co-founder and former CEO of crypto exchange FTX and trading firm Alameda Research, has been found guilty on all seven counts

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But why does it take another 5 months to give the actual sentence? That's a ridiculous amount of time, and apparently quite common!!

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Because judgment on previous similar cases must be researched (jurisprudence) and then each charge refers to a law that has a specific range of sentence length.

Then, the judgement usually also accounts for different factors(good or bad) to determine the length of the sentence for each charge within the range determined by the laws.

There is also determining if the sentences are concurrent or not. And there is probably a lot of other stuff.

This is what I can think of from the top of my head.

The judge must also write the judgement in legalese, referencing all that was taken into account for the judgement.

And this isn't the only case that the judge has to complete. They have multiple going on at the same time.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is a federal case there isn’t any standing law with regard to sentencing that needs to be researched. The guidelines are clear and known by all parties and the court. The delay is consistent with similar matters. The court will now hold sentencing conferences and hearing wherein both parties can present sentencing evidence such as testimony and mitigating factors that are not admissible during criminal proceedings or were not admissible to that particular proceeding. There are also a great deal of scheduling concerns and conflicts with regard to court staff and attorneys on both sides.

People should never be upset that due process is deliberate.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

Thanks for the clarification, I am not that versed in the judiciary procedures and your comment gave me a better understanding.

I agree with you, 5 months to wait for a potential life in prison isn't too slow.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Sounds a lot like doing an essay for school, where you have a week, and at the same time must do all your other school work.
I'd say this is unacceptable, and practices need to be streamlined for quicker judgements. Of course that may cost a bit more money, but 5 months is still ridiculous IMO.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

This is just like most jobs. Many things to do at the same time. I think 5 months for such a big case isn't that much of a time considering he is facing 110 years

[–] Joker@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Judges have clerks and a staff that will compile all the research and even draft orders. It’s not all on one person.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Both prosecutor and defense usually have recommendations for punishment, based on circumstances and previous practices. Having help checking that out, should not make it take longer.

[–] Joker@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

He’s going away for a long time. There’s a whole process to it beyond just the decision on the length of the sentence. He has to go through a psychological evaluation, physical exams, there’s a process to figure out where he will serve his sentence, etc. His attorneys will try to get him into an easier prison. Recent convicts are often afforded the opportunity to get their affairs in order. There will also be appeals.

It seems a long way off, but there’s a lot to do and there could be other factors. Maybe the judge’s schedule is a little backed up. There are holidays coming up. Who knows. SBF is already locked up anyway. There’s no way he’s getting less than 10-15 years so there’s not a huge sense of urgency to rush through this.