1996
submitted 1 year ago by ijeff@lemdro.id to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NoRodent@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

I mean, I might have considered paying for YT premium if I thought it offered some value (other than disabling ads) but I won't sure as hell pay for anything that any company is trying to blackmail me into.

[-] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean you didn't buy it before so why would you now? You don't need excuses. You just don't want to pay for it. Own it.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One could argue that we're paying for it without our consent, given the fact that Google doesn't pay anything in taxes. That's a cool four billion a year (at least) that they get from the American taxpayer for free.

[-] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One could argue that we're paying for it without our consent

One could argue that the Flying Spaghetti Monster exists. That doesn't make it remotely true.

Google doesn't pay anything in taxes

Uh. Google pays a shitload in taxes. There hasn't been a single year that they HAVEN'T paid taxes. They paid 11 billion in income taxes alone in 2022.

[-] pascal@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I use it because YouTube music is included and it's great while driving, it allows background play even with the screen off (I'm talking about mobile).

There's something more, but nothing that a pro user cannot already do with third tools.

[-] Zacryon@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I find it funny how sometimes apps "create value" by taking something away which is included by default in similar products and goes without saying.

In this context: YouTube is the only app I know which is denying to work when put into background or with the screen off.

Or take some car manufacturers who start asking for a fee just to use basic functionality.

[-] ArghZombies@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

But that's the wrong way around. They don't want you to pay, they make their money through advertising. They make far more money from advertiser's paying to put up ads than they ever make from people paying for premium.

Same as with Facebook now bringing in an ad-free version (in the EU anyway) - they charge higher than is reasonable so that people will opt for the ad-supported free version instead.

It's not that you are blackmailed into paying premium, it's that you're encouraged not to as a way of explicitly consenting to ads.

Basically, you're damned if you do, damned if you don't.

[-] LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 year ago

lmao you're so wrong on ads being more profitable than premium, especially on a per-user basis

According to this you can expect to make around $18/1000 views. That's with 55% going to the creator and 45% to Google. Which means that Google makes around $14.5 per 1000 views.

Coincidentally, that's also rougly the price of YouTube Premium. Are you telling me that you watch a thousand videos per month?

[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

That makes a lot of sense.

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
1996 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

60070 readers
3688 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS