601
I need Rule
(lemmy.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
601 points (99.8% liked)
196
16713 readers
2754 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
the modlogs are public, anyone can just go on hexbear, plug in your name and see why you got banned:
here's one of your removed comments:
the reason you were site banned was because you were having a meltdown over getting a comm ban for your genocide apologia (lmao)
People finding out that their history of being an asshole is public information will never not be funny
Be specific, which part of that was me being an asshole?
This, nonchalantly being a prick
Yes, that was shitty of me. It was a sarcastic comment against someone else (hence the :P), who also had their comments removed because they were behaving worse. But on Uplifting News, my comment really wasn't appropriate regardless. I deserved to have those comments removed as well as the brief temporary ban there. That was good moderation.
However that has nothing to do with hexbear or anything we're talking about here.
Focusing specifically on the comment I had removed from hexbear (quoted above), and the message I sent which led to the site ban (you can find that on Chapo from around that time), how was I being an asshole? How was my comment "genocide apologia" and how was I "malding" in the message?
I don't think you can actually back that up with any sound reasoning. Hence, the moderators at hexbear are shit, which makes the place a dumster fire.
Lol you think I hadn't already checked that during this discussion? I don't need to go to hexbear to see it, lemm.ee is still federated so it shows up in my local modlog. What's weird is that my ban on lemmy.ml doesn't for some reason, it looks like a bug where it didn't federate through properly - the comments shown as removed on the lemmy.ml modlog are still there on lemm.ee.
So what exactly in that is genocide apologia? Just because I'm criticising Palestinian attacks gone past does not mean I support Israel's response in any way. The comment literally finishes with me criticising both sides - ie, implying that all genocide is wrong.
It wasn't a meltdown, the message I sent was very tame - sarcastically thanking him for getting me banned. Feel free to dig it up, it was posted on Chapo. You'd struggle to call it "malding" - but then, that's what you're all about isn't it? Slapping a bullshit label that really doesn't fit, then arguing against that label. It's a form of scarecrow argument, one that is completely transparent when you actually look at it.
I don't care about your justification for both siding an ongoing genocide
I didn't "both side" the genocide - that would be saying that both sides are justified in committing genocide. I'm saying anyone who commits genocide is wrong. Meanwhile, there are a bunch of people caught up in the middle of it all. You would apparently dehumanise one portion of these people, because you value the other portion more. That is reprehensible.
In any case, we're not talking about my justification, we're talking about hexbear moderators' justification - of which there apparently is none. Thus, my point stands: hexbear is a dumpster fire; and that implies that hexbear devotees are trashy.
There is an active genocide happening, and you are going "all lives matter" because the brown people are being violent and resisting.
There is an active genocide happening, and I wish Israel would stop.
That doesn't mean I agree with the coordinated strike by Hamas on 7 October. Frankly, I don't think any reasonable person could see that as achieving any useful objective for the safety of Palestinian people. It was highly effective at killing Israelis, but the net result could only have been more suffering for Palestine.
There's definitely no easy solution - if there was the problem would have been solved by now. All anyone can say is that what's happening now is wrong. Meanwhile, there are many people profiting from the situation. Warmongers gotta monger some war.
My view is that Netanyahu wants to benefit from war, and that Hamas have been encouraged by people who want the same. 50 years isn't all that long ago to most people, but hardly anyone in Palestine is old enough to remember the last Yom Kippur war.
Hamas is a creation of Israels own actions. They have a history of erratic behavior politically including fighting alongside ISIS. They are still the elected government such as it is. It's absolutely sickening seeing comfortable westerners acting like they have some kind of right to pass judgment on people living in such a situation. They fight back however they can, and it's not going to be pretty because war and colonial occupation is not clean.
There is a simple solution, but it would either require Israel to stop being an ethnostate or stop existing so that a government which represents everyone in occupied Palestine can exist.
Anyone murdering civilians is sickening.
Imagine if Hamas had only targeted military installations in their attack, allowing almost everyone at the festival to flee and not raiding villages. Their incursion was incredibly effective - they could still have used drones to take out cell phone towers and prove that Netanyahu's early warning system was deeply flawed, and sniped the skeleton crew in the guard towers, then they could have focused their efforts on infrastructure damage to the military base or other legitimate targets. Hell, they probably even could have still taken a few hostages to use for actual negotiations - and in this scenario negotiations would be far more realistic to happen.
Exercising restraint would have presented a far better underdog for the world to get behind. It would have clearly shown that Israel's defence was weak. Instead, they allowed themselves to be riled up by their financial backers and went on a killing spree, putting the focus squarely on them, not Israel. Most people don't even know how they did it, just what they did when they got in, because what they did was so shocking. This played right into the hands of people who just wanted an excuse to expend some ordnance and kill them all.
It's simple to say that, but the practical application of doing that is anything but simple.
I already said don't care about your bullshit hand-wringing about the what-ifs an occupied people could have or should have done so that they would be a model minority for you (one who gets exterminated without putting up too much of a fight)
Yeah, America would need to stop supporting it and its ongoing genocide for that to happen.
Oh come on now, you criticise me, but you're the one who thinks bloody murder is justified. You really are reprehensible.
Yes America is everything that matters in this situation. Grow the fuck up and step out of your basement.
It's the primary funder, the president said that if Israel didn't exist the US would have had to create it, because it's so geopolitically critical. There's a large number of US ships there right now, in support of Israel.
I'm probably older than you
The existence of Israel is predicted on the bloody murder, and ethnic cleaning of Palestine, and completely unjustified.
*predicated.
The history is far more complicated than that. Israel wasn't really born out of a desire to ethnically cleanse Palestine, it was born out of a desire for a Zionist homeland and for independence from the British. Immediately afterwards, literally the following day, the Arab nations attacked.
Furthermore, Palestine was never really a country over the last 500 years, not until 1988. It was a region in the Ottoman empire, then it was under British control, then it was proposed to be split such that a nation of Israel and a nation of Palestine could be established - however Palestinians rejected this multiple times. Even in the Palestinian Declaration of Independence they didn't really define their territory, saying "The State of Palestine is the state of Palestinians wherever they may be" but referencing the UN Partition Plan.
By all accounts, when Israel was established in 1948 they wanted their own territory in the region as partitioned by Britain/the UN, they didn't want control over the entire region. It was only after successive fighting between Israel and Palestine that Israel developed the attitude they display today.
Whether or not Zionists, Israel, the British or the UN were right in pushing for the formation of an Israeli state is another matter, but the Israel we have now is a direct result of the wars that were fought, wars that Israel won each time. This is markedly different from colonialism, where one nation rules over another but then later grants independence and goes back to ruling its own territory - Israel do not have any other territory to go back to. Palestine taking an "all or nothing" position, as they have over the last 70 years, just isn't a workable solution as it puts Israel in the same boat.
you literally just misspelled 'criticize' in the comment above, but I didn't correct you because I don't fucking care and nobody else does either.
also fuck off colonizer genocide apologist, this is why you got banned
after the 1948 ethnic cleansing of Palestinians
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/criticise
Mine was an alternate spelling, yours had a completely different meaning.
this is where our conversation ends colonizer- I hope a brown person fills your mouth with shit someday
Disengage colonizer, nobody wants to read your genocide denial
What genocide am I denying? You're a pathetic liar.
The one happening now.
Fuck off
I've not denied the one happening now, I've criticised it.
Looks like we've come full circle and you've run out of material.
You both sides it you disgusting person
Your one routine is to smugly pass judgement on colonize people for resisting their own extermination, also you're British 🤮 🤮 🤮 🤮 🤮 🤮 🤮
@Diva @TWeaK wasn't the secret point of the Iraq War to use it as our foothold in the ME...
I would say that Israel was the foothold, Saddam used to be the US's 'guy' until he wasn't and the Iraq war was a bunch of criminal opportunists seizing on an opportunity to invade and loot a country with a flimsy pretext.