365

Had Donald Trump been the U.S. president hosting this week’s APEC meetings, I have no doubt that the headline from the event would have been unchanged. It would have been: “He’s a dictator.”

The only difference is it would be Xi Jinping who was saying it to describe Trump.

Other than that, though, a Trump-hosted APEC meeting would likely have been unrecognizably different from the successful and productive forum hosted by President Joe Biden.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Or we just think your claim about Trump was stupid.

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Trump did in fact escalate sanctions on Russia, as well as provide addition funding to Ukraine's military.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

as well as provide addition funding to Ukraine’s military.

Someone doesn't remember why he was impeached the first time...

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

That doesn't address what I said at all. Now I suppose it's time for you to insult me again.

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Yes it does. Trump did in fact give more weapons to Ukraine's military.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That still doesn't address what I said either.

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

It does. The narrative that Trump was working for Putin is so obviously false.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I never said Trump was working for Putin. You're putting words in my mouth again. Why can't you have an honest discussion?

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

That's what the first impeachment was about, working with Putin to influence the election.

this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
365 points (92.0% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3281 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS