166
submitted 1 year ago by btp@kbin.social to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Blur tools for Signal: if you take or edit photos of crowds or strangers with Signal, you can use our face blur tool to quickly hide people's biometric face data.

You can then export the photo from Signal if you want to post it publicly.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Extrasvhx9he@lemmy.today 31 points 1 year ago

Always heard blurring was ineffective and that solid colored boxes should be used instead

[-] akilou@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I trust that Signal wouldn't implement something if it was even questionably proven insecure

[-] Szymon@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago

I recall a story of a pedophile being caught because they posted pictures using a radial warp on the face. It wasn't too hard for enforcement to code a filter that undoes the radial warp, and instantly saw the original photo to identify and lock away the creep.

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 year ago

A warp doesn't technically lose the information, it merely displaces it. A good blur algorithm on the other hand will lead to loss of information.

[-] Szymon@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/UpJ-kGII074?si=EoQQeplKXYj5kMT0

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] alwaysconfused@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

For those who are interested, here is a 20 minute mini-documentary about this individual that goes by the name of Mr. Swirl.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Mr. Swirl

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] ErwinLottemann@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago

i think that is only valid for text, the method to restore blurred text is to draw and blur a lot of combinations and compare them to the blurred image. that's probably not a thing with faces i guess...

[-] guyrocket@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

That does sound more effective. You really have to trust that the blur algorithm cannot be reverse engineered if you use that. Removing the data seems more certain than transforming it somehow.

[-] Grunt4019@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

The blur seems pretty good to me, doesn’t seem like you could do any reverse processing to identify the face post blur.

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
166 points (94.1% liked)

Privacy

31937 readers
647 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS