61
submitted 1 year ago by Grappling7155@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

Steven Guilbeault, Canada’s environment minister, said the government was “strongly considering” an appeal of the federal court’s ruling.

By Vjosa Isai • New York Times

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

You can agree with the premise from a biological and chemistry standpoint while disagreeing with a policy from a legal one.

The feds will simply need to redraft the legislation and word it better.

[-] zaphod@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Or pass new legislation. The government tried to use existing environment legislation to ban single use plastics by listing them among other toxic substances. That that didn't pass judicial review isn't actually that surprising (depending on how the original law was drafted).

The alternative is just to amend that law to add additional powers to ban bioaccumulating and/or biomagnifying substances, of which microplastics are just one example.

It's just more work, obviously, than using an existing legislative tool.

[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 1 points 1 year ago

Hopefully. The trick is that waste management is traditionally provincial jurisdiction, and there would be a fight if they try to change that.

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
61 points (96.9% liked)

Canada

7204 readers
139 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS