260
submitted 11 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Largest Study of its Kind Shows Outdated Password Practices are Widespread::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 111 points 11 months ago

The article focuses on password requirements that websites implement, not user behaviors. Common bad practices mentioned:

  • Permit very short passwords
  • Do not block common passwords
  • Use outdated requirements like complex characters
[-] Kengaro0@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Complex characters are outdated? It also refers to special characters but I guess that's what I was thinking of. So special characters are in, so what is a complex character then?

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 56 points 11 months ago

Length is the most important thing, everything else is somewhat secondary. We should be shifting thinking of this to passphrases rather than passwords.

I'm sure most of us have seen the "correct horse battery staple" XKCD, but that's what people really need to think of as passwords now, not my-favourite-celebrity-but-with-the-"e"-changed-to-"3"-and-an-exclamation-mark-at-the-end.

[-] wavebeam@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Nah fuck that. Sites need to adopt this passkeys instead. It’s an impossible task for people to have unique credentials for every site, even if they are “memorable”. This is a design issue not a personal responsibility one. When designing for large volumes of people, you have to assume that the majority will do something easy and stupid over difficult and smart.

[-] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 15 points 11 months ago

Until they do, password managers get you most of the way there, by letting you have a single password on your side, mapping to one password for each login. Bitwarden is great, and free.

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 11 months ago

Bitwarden is the way

[-] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago

Sites need to stop needing an account for everything. My haveibeenpwnd is full of sites that I can't believe had my email in the first place. Obviously I gave it to them but like cmon

[-] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 2 points 11 months ago

Damn you my go-to password in the 2010's was "P4nc4kes!".

[-] errer@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

A character that extends outside the real number line

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 5 points 11 months ago

My characters extends outside time and space.

Make for very secure passwords.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Thanks for this, I knew the concept but I've always had a hard time putting it to words. Yeah, its not like they increase the entropy or anything. Same with diacritics

Reminds me of when Michael tells Dwight he and Jim make different amounts: its not about higher or lower, its just different

[-] Claidheamh@slrpnk.net 4 points 11 months ago

Either you or I got wooshed, cause I thought that was a maths joke, not actually an answer.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If your password is onky made up of numbers and there's no or a faulty anti-replay feature, you can just keep tryinguntil you iterate to the right password.

People used to do it with 4 digit PINs

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 6 points 11 months ago

I think enforcing complex characters is outdated. Allowing them is enough, since someone brute forcing still needs to consider them. Of course they could try all lower, then mixed, then including complex characters in that order to catch those that don't. But still, it's better to have a password made up of compound words that is longer, than S0meth!ngV3ryC0nvolu73D. Or just pure random (aka password generator)

My main issue is places that have a maximum password length. This is firstly a limitation on security, but more importantly throws a red flag because of the potential reasons for having a password length limit!

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Depends on the limit really, if the limit is 32 characters or something like that, definite red flag.

If the limit is something like 250 or more characters, I'm more inclined to believe it's basic protection from all the things that can go wrong when someone repeatedly POSTs whatever the maximum amount of garbage that your server's request limit allows, at an API that performs cryptographic work.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago
  • Do not block common passwords

Do you mean "not blocking common passwords"?

This implies that I can totally use "password1"

[-] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago

I copied the list straight from the article, so excuse the awkward phrasing. But yes, the implication is that you could totally use "password1" on some websites.

this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
260 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3600 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS