851
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 284 points 1 year ago

Cool. So what’s he gonna do about it? Or was this it?

[-] iBaz@lemmy.world 104 points 1 year ago

What can he do about it? We live in a free market society. All he can do is keep talking about it and hope the people get the message. Rebellion will start at the consumer level and go up, not the other way around. Main problem is the millions of people that rely on Fox for their news.

[-] WeeSheep@lemmy.world 153 points 1 year ago

Use the anti monopoly laws we have in place to prevent price gouging from lack of competition

[-] protist@mander.xyz 138 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He issued an executive order in 2021 to do just that, among many other things to promote competition. There has definitely been an uptick in antitrust cases since then, and inflation has also decreased significantly.

https://www.justice.gov/atr/antitrust-case-filings

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 42 points 1 year ago

Sorry to be pedantic on the internet (lol) but it might be more accurate to say inflation has slowed.

[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Up like a rocket down like a parachute.

[-] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Except the unfortunate part is that it is always increasing, it's just a derivative, rate of change. But the massive boost from months of heavy inflation is now here permanently, so we're adding 2-3% on TOP of the already-inflated costs. But that's not telling the full story, it is the value of the US dollar going down primarily. Buying power is lower by definition, but because of that, everyone on the bottom end is getting squeezed beyond anything they are ready for and it's going to eventually cause civil unrest on a larger scale.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

He picked two points in time and described a number that was fixed at each instance, so decreased works fine.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] protist@mander.xyz 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Burn the pedant!

I still think decreased is accurate though, the rate of inflation is significantly smaller today vs then, so the rate has decreased

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah if it was deflation that would’ve been a huge deal because our economy is built on an inflationary assumption and deflation would crash it

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The bipartisan PPP (passed under Trump) was insane.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

lets add taxing the shit out of people who do this to the list.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

How would you like the President of the United States to do that? Do you think the President is a dictator that can just unilaterally pass sweeping legislation? How do you think the public would react if the President had the power to directly determine the prices of goods? How do you think that would go in general?

[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 6 points 1 year ago

The fact this is even in the negatives a tiny bit really demonstrates the typical political intelligence of your average voter.

You’re of course completely correct, and Biden has indeed done everything he LEGALLY can do, which is probably why we’re suffering far less than a lot of the rest of the developed world economically speaking.

People just like to shout at the wind, it seems.

[-] Deiv@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago

Damn there is nothing the government can do. Sorry guys :( You'll just have to buy less food, and maybe then the corporations will get the hint!

Regulations? Laws against price gauging? Naw, they can't do that. It's the consumers that are at fault!

[-] iBaz@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Do you think Biden makes the laws? Did you fail civics class? I said nothing about enacting laws making what these companies are doing illegal, I only said Biden can’t do much about it.

[-] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

He can propose laws to the legislative bramch. He might not be able to pass it himself but he could push and advocate for it

[-] cole@lemdro.id 14 points 1 year ago

I'm sure the GOP-led house would be very receptive to that

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] graymess@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Price controls are well within the president's powers. It's not that radical of a concept.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 year ago

It's within congress's powers for sure. I don't think the president. Congress has done it in the past though, so they for sure can again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 7 points 1 year ago

Why is this upvoted?

No, the president of the United States cannot unilaterally implement price controls on goods without the involvement of Congress. Price controls typically involve changes to laws and regulations, which fall under the legislative branch's authority. Congress would need to pass legislation granting such powers or specifically authorizing the president to implement price controls in certain circumstances.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

The US was pretty good about taxing corporations before Reagan

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] pan_troglodytes@programming.dev 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

that was basically it. short of siccing the irs on them there's not a lot the executive branch can do about it... of course that'd kill the golden goose named "campaign contributions", so it wont happen

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

siccing the IRS on them

Nothing the IRS can do, either.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 year ago

Windfall taxes is a thing they can use. If companies raise their prices too fast the excess profit gets taxed at a higher rate.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Need the House for that tho.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] takeda@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

It will be harder to pass new laws in the current Congress, but he still has control over the executive branch. Hopefully some existing laws could be used.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He appointed the most aggressive FTC head in decades who is using the antitrust law we have to currently go after Google and Amazon.

She's also fighting a merger between Kroger and Albertsons, which would drastically raise grocery prices.

The FTC is also fighting the hedge fund buyout of preciously independent healthcare clinics, which has massively ramped up medical costs.

Not to mention breaking the real estate agent fee monopoly.

His executive branch has been busy as hell trying to help people.

[-] Locuralacura@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago

Don't tell us facts. We've already decided to believe whatever the fuck we want regardless. /s

[-] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Biden should be waving the magic wand! I am mad that he is not doing this!

[-] timewarp@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

He'll hire their execs to run various government agencies

load more comments (11 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
851 points (97.5% liked)

News

23376 readers
2388 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS