28

The annual car reliability survey by Consumer Reports found EVs are 79 percent more likely to have problems than conventional cars. Consumers reported electric drive motors, charging and EV batteries had the most common issues associated with EVs, according to the survey.

Jake Fisher, senior director of auto testing at Consumer Reports, noted that there may be “growing pains” among EVs because they are based on new technology or are being manufactured by new upstart companies, such as Rivian. He said companies “need some time to work out the bugs,” according to the magazine.

Plug-in hybrids are more likely to have more issues than gas-powered cars, EVs and hybrid vehicles. The survey said that plug-in hybrids have 146 percent more problems than gas-powered cars.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 10 points 11 months ago

Rivian, according to the article. Saved you a click.

[-] drdabbles@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, the problem is it isn't Rivian. I own one, and I previously owned the actual shitty brand.

[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 5 points 11 months ago

“Rivian and legacy auto makers” saved you another click.

[-] drdabbles@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Tesla, bud. Sorry to tell you, it's Tesla that sucks.

[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 2 points 11 months ago
[-] MagicPterodactyl@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

Mini at #3 is the most shocking part of this.

[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 3 points 11 months ago

People love their Minis, bruh.

[-] MagicPterodactyl@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

Oh I love them too. My family has had a few and all of them have had major mechanical failures at under 100k miles. They are just more cheaply made BMWs after all.

[-] drdabbles@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago

Hilarious that you included the graphic proving you aren't talking about EVs, but hybrids, phev, and bev. You're confused about the topic being discussed, clearly.

Go ahead to their ratings page, select BEVs, and order by score. You'll kind the EV6 is at the top. If you had actually read their entire article, you would see that they said PHEVs are less reliable than BEVs as a class.

[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

“Oh no you brought facts and information to my feelings!”

Cope more.

[-] drdabbles@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago

Says the one that quoted a partial sentence to try to support their bullshit take. The article literally says this is the first year that CR recomments the MODEL Y, and only because they suspect the drivertrain issues have mostly been solved. After 7 years of production vehicles. Amazing stuff.

I'm guessing you're an investor but not an owner to be working this hard to bend what CR reported. What a shame.

[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 1 points 11 months ago

I’m just pointing out the data from the article we are all referencing my dude.

Glad you love your Rivian so much, though! I’m all for EVs and hope it serves you well for a long time.

[-] drdabbles@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

The problem is, you aren't. Because here's what they actually said in the article:

“Most electric cars today are being manufactured by either legacy automakers that are new to EV technology, or by companies like Rivian that are new to making cars,”

Simply stating the fact that most EVs are made by, existing companies or startups. Literally the only two choices that there are.

Source: https://www.consumerreports.org/cars/car-reliability-owner-satisfaction/electric-vehicles-are-less-reliable-than-conventional-cars-a1047214174/

The Model Y comment:

Its Model Y, first introduced for model year 2020, is recommended by CR for the first time this year, with owners reporting fewer issues with its suspension, in-car electronics and general build quality than in previous years.

Again, pointing out that after four years of producing the vehicle, they finally have fewer owners reporting issues with major components of the car. and as they note in the article, they aren't weighting the problems that consumers report for the severity of the issue or the criticality of the component, but just counting any issues whatsoever that required repair.

This isn't even a controversial thing, CR has reported it multiple times. You simply didn't bother look at the source, don't understand the breakdown between Hybrid, PHEV, and BEV, and you're here pretending the article came to a conclusion that simply IS NOT stated anywhere within.

If you're interested in actually reading what CR has reported about most reliable EVs, you can find that here https://www.consumerreports.org/cars/hybrids-evs/best-electric-vehicles-from-consumer-reports-tests-a3759669425/

Do better next time. Bye.

[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 1 points 11 months ago

How many years until they recommend Rivian is acceptable to you? Or did they do that already and I missed it?

Rivian started to release cars in 2021, so they better work on getting out of 28/30 place in another year or two according to your own logic.

Let's hope they do better.

[-] drdabbles@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Do send along the CR report where they put Rivian in 28/30. I look forward to that, because your graphic wasn't on the CR site, or The Hill's article about the CR article.

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
28 points (66.3% liked)

News

23311 readers
3613 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS