742
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A nationally recognized online disinformation researcher has accused Harvard University of shutting down the project she led to protect its relationship with mega-donor and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.

The allegations, made by Dr. Joan Donovan, raise questions about the influence the tech giant might have over seemingly independent research. Facebook’s parent company Meta has long sought to defend itself against research that implicates it in harming society: from the proliferation of election disinformation to creating addictive habits in children. Details of the disclosure were first reported by The Washington Post.

Beginning in 2018, Donovan worked for the Shorenstein Center at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, and ran its Technology and Social Change Research Project, where she led studies of media manipulation campaigns. But last year Harvard informed Donovan it was shutting the project down, Donovan claims.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago

And just like that, I lost a lot of trust on Harvard.

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 68 points 11 months ago

Harvard is where they got caught taking money from the sugar lobby and put out a paper pointing away from sugar as a leading cause of heart disease and towards saturated fat. This changed health policy in America, killing who knows how many.

Harvard has deserved no credibility for longer than we've been alive.

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

I never really trust institutions that put money above all else.

Not sure why people think colleges are exempt from scummy behavior. They're a business, not a charity lol.

[-] SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es 4 points 11 months ago

Most colleges are non-profits, which means they are supposed to be, ya know, not profit seekers. Harvard, like many others, is not a business.

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You're beyond delusional if you think people aren't profiting at harvard.

Harvard, like many others, is not a business.

Okay. Lol.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I didn't go to college at all after high school because I think universities are a scam.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The US implementation of University Education is prone to scams.

The actual concept of higher education to train people to have certain highly complex expertises necessary for high value added industries is not a scam, as the facts on the ground make clear: it's not by chance that even in the ultra-Capitalist United States companies in advanced areas such as Tech hire lots of university graduates with degrees applicable for those areas, rather than go for the much more abundant and hence cheaper people with just high-school which would yield them bigger profits if the university degrees in those areas did not justify the higher cost of hiring those with such degrees (in fact you'll notice them trying to contain manpower costs by hiring foreigners with such degrees, but not by hiring high-school graduates)

Ultimatelly your own educational choice was good or bad depending on which university degrees were available in the area for which you have a knack (and indeed in certain areas there really is no point in higher education) and how much would it would cost you: many degrees are effectivelly worthless, many more are not worth the cost in work-experience years lost whilst taking that degree and quite a lot are not worth the monetary cost charged by US universities for them, but some are still worth it even at the ridiculously high cost of getting a degree in the US.


In summary, if you meant that all higher education is a scam, that's a ridiculous generaliszation that goes against observable reality, but if you meant that some (maybe even most) university education in the US is a scam, I agree with you.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I'm in the US, so yes, most universities here are a scam.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Well, in that sense I was lucky to have been born in a Western nation where society values Education highly and were the State actually serves people not "business" (at least back then, it's worse now) so all I had to do was have high enough grades in the relevant areas in high-school and in my Physics and Maths entrance exams to get 5 years of Science and Engineering higher education pretty much for free.

I suspect that, given my low income origins, had I been born in the US or even UK (were universities are also expensive and access is nowhere as meritocratic as my own country), given my natural propention the top range of my professional qualifications would've ended up as Car Mechanic or maybe Hacker, rather than Engineer.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago
[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I wish it was more like that everywhere: people should all have the opportunity to be all they can be.

I ended up involved in a leftwing political party when I lived in the UK because I concluded that local kids with the same kind of origin and skills like me over there had nowhere the same opportunities I was lucky to have, whilst the well-connected children of the upper classes had a veritable red-carpet all their lifes, no merit whatsoever required - and that shit really goes against all my principles when it comes to fairness.

Mind you, Hell would freeze over before a party following the principle of Equal Opportunity got power in the UK, so me putting some effort into helping a small leftwing party there was hopeless from the start, but I did it anyway.

[-] rwhitisissle@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Colleges don't have external investors or are technically "owned" in the same way a business is. But they do functionally operate in the same way as profit based institutions. This is because the people who run them understand that industry connections can be immensely profitable. You help fudge some numbers or put out dubious research backing a particular industry and you might find yourself in a position in which you get paid to "consult" for those companies later on.

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

You're right, it's a real estate trust.

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Can i have some of what youre smoking? Reality is too real today

this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
742 points (98.2% liked)

News

23397 readers
3652 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS