249
submitted 11 months ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's what a personality cult gets you. The amount of idiots willing to die for another man's ego is why we have some of the shittiest things in society. “Daddy told me so” is a powerful force when the people who believe it cannot see that their vision has absolutely no rational support. Jobs, Musk, Gates, Trump, they all thrive by telling people that their irrational beliefs are true and if they follow them they will make their dreams realities. The talk and narrative around Altman has always struck me similar to Musk's cult of personality in the late 2010s.

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Stock options help. If they make enough off of OpenAI, they won't need to find a job after this.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

This is tech, they have no protections. I bet there's some clause with a time lock that they can only sell the stock in 10 years time and they lose them if they leave OpenAI before that time window for any reason. In 5 years or before they'll get hit by some mass layoffs and lose everything. This has happened so many times before with so many companies that it is laughable. Stock options in tech are a fairy tale.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 6 points 11 months ago

Especially in a company that's a non-profit, lmao.

Sheep gonna sheep.

[-] FrostyTrichs@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The amount of idiots willing to die for another man's ego

U.S. Military has entered the chat

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm not sure Gates ever had a "personality cult". In the 90s during his heyday he was pretty much reviled even by Windows users. He built his empire by swallowing everyone else around him that was doing anything even a little bit innovative. He wasn't really the "visionary artist/engineer" type like those others. Just a random rich nerd who won the technology monopoly game.

[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Like @Zak, I would like to point out that - as much as I despised Bill Gates back then - he was actually competent. And - despite me never liking Microsoft - they have a legitimate business model built on selling products, not user data (like all social media and google). So of all the evil dipshits out there, Microsoft and Apple are the lesser ones. (I am a Linux user since 2004 or so)

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Early accounts are that Bill Gates was absolutely a talented coder, at least in the 1970s. Of course that was't what made him rich - a series of business decisions that were some combination of lucky and prescient were.

this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
249 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

59467 readers
3689 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS