108
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago
[-] Akrenion@programming.dev 32 points 11 months ago

Pollution and home safety aside. I found it nice to pinpoint my desired heat. It works so fast and accurate that I got consistent pancakes like i never used to before.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's pretty cool. Can they heat a pan as fast as a gas stove? One of the major inconveniences with an electric stove is having to wait for the burner to heat up, before you can wait for your pan to heat up. I've had resistive stoves for decades now, and they're not very good IMO. But I've never had an induction stove. I've really missed the gas stove we had when I was a kid.

[-] intelisense@lemm.ee 24 points 11 months ago

Simple answer: yes, induction hobs are fast, maybe even faster than gas.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

That's really cool.

[-] cestvrai@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

Back on gas after having induction (moved).

I also grew up on resistive and was as skeptical as you are. Now, I dream about upgrading to induction again once we are able to reno the kitchen. For example, boiling water on induction is more than twice as fast as gas and the temp adjustment goes so quick that even cooking eggs is a breeze.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah, when I fry eggs the pan heats up to temperature in literally seconds - not a half a minute, but like 5 to 10 seconds.

[-] DroneRights@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Resistive stoves are slow because heat has to move from the coils, to the air above the coils, to the glass top, to the pan, to the food.

Gas stoves are fast because heat can move from the flame, to the pan, to the food.

Induction cooktops are the fastest because heat gets to move directly from the pan, to the food.

Induction uses magnetic fields to directly impart energy into the metal of your pan. Magnetic fields move energy at the speed of light. That's faster than gas can move heat. Which means your pan warms up quicker.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

You can imagine an induction stove to work similarly to a resistive stove, only with your pan/pot being the resistive element. The slow part of resistive stoves is the heat transfer from the element to the cookware, so you can imagine how quickly an inductive stove heats that thing up!

[-] set_secret@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

it's noticeably faster than a gas stove. plus the neat thing is it's not giving you and your family cancer!

[-] theKalash@feddit.ch 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They don't require an explosive to be pumped into your house.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

That's not really the type of information I was looking for, but thanks anyways.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Gas stoves also emit stuff like benzene, which has been linked to cancer, and NO2 which has been linked to asthma.

But ignoring the health issues, induction is faster for boiling stuff, and arguably more precise. You likely don't need new pans either. Flat bottom, cast iron works fine and stainless works fine for me.

It just takes some getting used to.

[-] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

You have special stainless then, most won’t work.

If you can stick a magnet to the bottom it will work.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I mean, I bought the set in aldi. It was in the bargain bin for something like 60 euros for 10 pots and pans. Was worried it wouldn't work when I moved. Tried it. Worked just fine. Apparently plenty of stainless steel stuff works just fine.

This isn't particularly interesting.

But just to say, before buying new expensive ones that claim to be designed for induction, try the old ones you already own. Chances are they'll work just fine.

[-] DroneRights@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

They're out of line but they're right

[-] sxan@midwest.social 8 points 11 months ago

While I don't agree they're better, a key feature over conventional electric (and one of the main benefits of gas) is that the stove surface doesn't inherently retain heat. They get hot, but only because the pan is hot. When you turn down the heat, it's immediate, like a gas stove.

I don't know about how fast they can heat; gas can output a ridiculous amount of BTUs, but at 240v I wouldn't be surprised.

[-] sushibowl@feddit.nl 5 points 11 months ago

Have to keep efficiency in mind as well. Practically all of the heat produced by induction goes directly into the pan bottom. With gas, quite a bit of the heat doesn't end up in the pan.

In my experience, induction on high settings heats much faster than gas. Sometimes faster than is desirable actually. A pot of water will boil at the bottom when the top is only somewhat warm.

[-] 768@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

I don't know about the US, but in Germany it's common that the individual or two plates of the induction stoves have their own 380V cable and breaker.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

North America has one 240v plug for the whole appliance, 120v is what's used for regular electric items.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago

The US often has some appliances wired for 240V; I assume stovetops are, but IDK. Large appliances have their own breakers. I was told that if we wanted to install a built-in microwave, it'd require a new, dedicated wire and breaker.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 11 months ago

A lot of places have code requirements that the microwave have its own breaker even though they're almost all 120v; it's because they use almost all the amps on the 120v circuit so you tend to trip the breaker if you have anything else big going on, like an electric kettle or a vacuum cleaner.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah, in the US for an electric range you're looking at a single 240 volt split phase 30 amp circuit.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 7 points 11 months ago

Better air quality, otherwise they are merely not as inconvenient as other types of electric stoves.

But you need to buy new induction capable pots for them and the pulsing heat they make takes some time to get used to.

[-] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 13 points 11 months ago

AFIAK they also work with cast iron cookware.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Any ferrous metal. Right? So anything except stainless steel. I'm guessing you probably want something fairly thick too.

[-] Gnugit@aussie.zone 4 points 11 months ago

Yes, very thick otherwise you get a burn spot everytime around the middle.

Also, my stainless pan works fine on my induction stove.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Does it have a fused base of other metals?

[-] Gnugit@aussie.zone 1 points 11 months ago

Yes, aluminium "Sleek Seamless Impact Bonded Sandwich Base with Aluminium Core"

https://scanpan.com.au/fry-pan-32cm-x-6cm/

[-] Gnugit@aussie.zone 1 points 11 months ago

That may be it, I'm not sure I bought it at a thrift store.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

Stainless often works too IME.

[-] BrowseMan@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

From experience, they work as long as a magnet can stick to it, so yes flany ferrous metal should work.

Induction is the best cooking method to me. Faster and safer than electric and gas, (much) easier to control than electric...

Ah and so much easier to clean than gas!

Only gas advantage I could see is maybe heat "fine tuning". And even this probably depend on the system (the one I used had roughly 6 heating level, but there is system with more). And is not very important except if you're a high level chef.

[-] gullible@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Enamel and aluminum are the only ones I’ve had issues with, personally.

[-] BrowseMan@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

What they do now is "sanwchich" with a disc of induction-compatible metal inserted in the bottom of the cookware.

Allows compatibility (and better heat spread I think)

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

You don't necessarily need to buy new pots as the ones you have might as well already be ferrous.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 11 months ago

I'm still using my old cast iron cookware.

The pots that did need replacing when I went from coils to induction were a set of very cheap stainless steel ones that I bought when I was a student.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

That's mainly an issue with aluminum and stainless steel, but only some types of stainless steel. It's a good stuff that I have all works flawlessly on the induction.

If you buy the aluminum Japanese cookware, they are all designed for induction anyways.

[-] Krotiuz@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

In addition to the other comments about it being just as quick, if not faster and easier to get a consistent heat, I also found the noise level was way better - it'll hum if the pan isn't centered properly, and the power is turned up, but when simmering, it's pretty much silent which was weird but suprisingly nice.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Instantaneous control over temperature without the safety issues of gas

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Safer, cheaper, cleaner.

Safer being no indoor air pollution and to cook surface doesn't get hot at all. You can literally put a piece of paper between the pan and the cooktop and it will cook without burning the paper.

[-] sour@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago
this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
108 points (93.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5237 readers
286 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS