716
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 151 points 1 year ago

I want any Texan to give me the moral justification for forcing a woman to give birth to a baby that will only live for a few hours in agony before dying. Because this isn't stopping what they call murder. There's no murder here even if you consider abortion to be murder in general because there will be no life for this fetus/baby/whatever you want to call it.

I want to know why this woman should be banned from having an abortion in Texas beyond 'we said no abortions and we mean it.'

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago

“God’s will” is the typical refrain. I usually reply with “Then why are you wearing shoes? If god wanted something on your feet he would have given them to you”. Glasses are similarly blasphemy according to their poor logic.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

Or why do you ever go to the doctor for anything? Shouldn't it be "God's will" if you break an arm or get pneumonia?

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

I remember one of the priests at my childhood (Roman Catholic) church had a great sermon about this mentality. He told the story of a woman trapped on the roof of her home after a horrible flood. A man in a rowboat finds her and attempts to lend assistance. “No need! God will save me”. Confused, he moved on. Next, a motor boat passes by, offering to help her from her roof as well. Again, “no thanks, God will save me!” Later on, a coast guard chopper arrives. The rescuer winched down onto the roof is similarly rebuked by the woman. She soon dies from exposure. When she arrives into heaven she angrily asks God why he didn’t save her to which God answers “I sent two boats and a rescue helicopter for you!”

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

That sermon is a joke that i heard when i was a kid prob 20 years ago or so.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well it was one of the few I found interesting so I guess good for that guy for getting me to listen. He made it about how god helps people that help themselves after the punchline

[-] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Some of them are that crazy. Let me introduce you to the Church of Christ, Scientist (yes that's actually their name).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_Christ,_Scientist

[-] Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Knowing Better made a great video about them and their founder!

[-] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I hold the opinion the religious should live much more like the Amish. If you don’t believe in science, don’t. But they shouldn’t be able to cherry pick which science to believe in.

[-] pottedmeat7910@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

These are literally grown adults that believe in magic. There's not going to be any reasonable explanation that will make any sense to anyone outside of their cult.

She is a sinner so she must endure her divine punishment. That's the whole argument.

[-] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

The folks I know who believe in magic believe in faeries and healing crystals. They don't have issues with abortions.

These folks believe in religion, which is far worse than magic.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

I dunno, Jesus was pretty much a DnD cleric, and they do magic all the time.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Jesus literally had a magic wand in some early Christian imagery.

[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago

They believe god may grant the fetus a reprieve at any moment. They believe in magic, ffs. What do you expect?

[-] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Couldn’t god just make the abortion not work? Maybe give the doctor a heart attack, or make Jesus appear on the sonogram like he does on toast?

[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I mean he could make a lot of things not work, but prefers to allow our fuck ups with random miracles mixed in. Apparently free will means letting us do bad shit.

And that’s where the whole tri-omni approach starts to eat its own tail.

I have a whole shtick about free will not being compatible with either a materialistic nor a tri-omni worldview. I simply do not believe it exists, nor is it possible.

[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

The omnis just don't work sanely, not that believers will listen.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Epicurus tackled it centuries before Christianity existed:

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.

Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.

Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?

Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I doubt in many cases they even believe in the science that says this is going to be the outcome, because science isn't real.

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago

They think science is a religion. Manifestation of your will is what makes reality. So if they pray hard enough, it will have an effect. They think people who consider themselves scientists are just making it up and making it real because they believe it so much.

[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I don't see why they would doubt that. In my experience they tend to trust medical science but god is a super doc that might miracle someone in a bad spot.

[-] LaVacaMariposa@mander.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

Because god works in mysterious ways or some bullshit like that?

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
716 points (98.4% liked)

News

23634 readers
2646 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS