779
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] might_steal_your_cat@lemm.ee 22 points 11 months ago

What about 3D Venn diagrams, but the sets are spheres?

[-] jadero@mander.xyz 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think for maximum uselessness, they should not be overlapping spheres, but deform at the interface, like soap bubbles or rubber balls. As long as the spheres are the same size and modelled with the same "surface tension" or "elasticity", the "intersection" of two sets would then be a circular interface with an area proportional to what would otherwise be an overlap (I think). If the spheres have different sizes or are modelled with different surface tension or elasticity, one would "intrude" into the other.

Multiple sets would have increasingly complex shapes that may or not also create volumes external to the deformed spheres but still surrounded by the various interfaces.

Time to break out the mathematics of bubbles and foam. This data ain't gonna obscure itself!

Might there actually be utility to something like this? Scrunch the spheres together but make invisible everything that is not an interface and label the faces accordingly. I suppose the same could be said of the shape described by overlapping. (Jesus, you'd think I was high or something. Just riffing.)

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

(Jesus, you'd think I was high or something. Just riffing.)

I am, maybe that's why I made it all the way down here ;).

Might there actually be utility to something like this? Scrunch the spheres together but make invisible everything that is not an interface and label the faces accordingly.

What if the labels of the faces on the 3D (pressure points or interfaces) were like things that kept the 'soap bubbles' from merging? Like for example: science watchers of MSM being kept from understanding climate change

Is that what you were thinking?

[-] jadero@mander.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

No, that's not what I was thinking, but that sounds like a decent idea. Maybe a better idea than just simple labels representing the facing sphere.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Venn diagrams, but the sets represent whatever the diagram is about (like houses for housing markets).

[-] might_steal_your_cat@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago
[-] abir_vandergriff@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

Projected on a 2D screen, it'd look more like a normal venn diagram.

[-] jadero@mander.xyz 6 points 11 months ago

That's what 3D printing is for...

[-] cynar@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Volumetric Herbert space diagram.

Why limit it to 3 dimensions?

[-] hansl@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Why limit it to an integer number of dimensions?

[-] cynar@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Because I'm not sure how to make it work in non integer dimensions.

[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago
[-] SaltyIceteaMaker@iusearchlinux.fyi 4 points 11 months ago

One might even go as far as 5D

[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

When I read your comment, my monocle popped right off!

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
779 points (99.4% liked)

Science Memes

10950 readers
1990 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS