177
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A federal judge who is weighing whether to allow the nation’s first execution by nitrogen hypoxia to go forward next month, urged Alabama on Thursday to change procedures so the inmate can pray and say his final words before the gas mask is placed on his face.

U.S. District Judge R. Austin Huffaker made the suggestion in a court order setting a Dec. 29 deadline to submit information before he rules on the inmate’s request to block the execution. The judge made similar comments the day prior at the conclusion of a court hearing.

Alabama is scheduled to execute Kenneth Eugene Smith on Jan. 25 in what would be the nation’s first execution using nitrogen gas. Nitrogen hypoxia is authorized as an execution method in Alabama, Mississippi and Oklahoma but has never been used to put an inmate to death.

The proposed execution method would use a gas mask, placed over Smith’s nose and mouth, to replace breathable air with nitrogen, causing Smith to die from lack of oxygen.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yesman@lemmy.world 79 points 10 months ago

I think public executions where the prisoner is tortured to death are more progressive than supposed "humane" methods.

Not because I like cruelty or think they deserve it, but I want the State to do it's killing out in the open where citizens are exposed to what's happening in their name. Hiding the act behind closed doors and beneath a cloak of "humane" methods allows the State to exercise ultimate authority in secret from the people from whom that authority is derived. It's the State and the supporters of the death penalty that are being spared pain.

Yes, I got this from Foucault.

[-] Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 86 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You highly overestimate the amount of compassion the average person has. If you torture people to death in public people will sell tickets for the best seats. The Romans built a whole damn arena for this purpose.

[-] jwt@programming.dev 22 points 10 months ago

If anything, I think it would normalize killing (even more). But I guess I get where OP is coming from: Governments shouldn't get away with killing a human by claiming it's a humane act.

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Yes! you're correct. It will be spectacle and celebration. We may revel in our cruelty, but we cannot feign mercy.

The question of capital punishment comes into focus. I don't trust in compassion; I'm advocating for honesty.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago

I can’t tell if you’re joking or if you think people have the same morals as someone from the roman history

[-] wolfshadowheart@slrpnk.net 16 points 10 months ago

Have you seen the state of the world lately? I'm surprised we don't have the football stadiums converted once a year for this

[-] psmgx@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago
[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago

The job of corporations and media and politics is to divide people. And even more so it will make you think your neighbor is a savage. It keeps people alone and independent workers to exploit. When in reality, your neighbors are average people that aren’t bloodthirsty. Most people can hardly handle their own lives and are depressed enough as it is without having a sporting event dedicated to killing people. I didn’t realize how well this propaganda type stuff works but clearly it does.

[-] wolfshadowheart@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

When Nazis stop going across the country having hate parades in my state I'll agree with you.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You’re right, I’m sure the majority of your state is politically extremist and would welcome blood sport.

[-] wolfshadowheart@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 months ago

We are historically a sundown state. The leading party is trying to ban books and change education curriculums. Our police showed up in riot gear for peaceful protests like when Roe v. Wade was turned, and those same police are literal klan members. We know this because during that Nazi rally I mentioned, the police in uniform were nowhere to be found. They were all photographed taking part in the rally. Yet these officers are happy to show up armed in riot gear at peaceful protests...

So yeah, I do feel that my state is politically extremist, and a number of people would absolutely welcome something like that. I wish it weren't how I felt and I wish it weren't the truth, but that's just the byproduct of 2016 and years and years of Fox News and other propaganda "politicizing" peoples identity.

Most of the state? As individuals definitely not, there are many against our state government who actively campaign. We get targeted, followed home, and assaulted for being queer, for being activists who dare try and speak out against hatred at peaceful protests. And yet despite all of us, somehow all those asshats are still getting elected with no policies made to protect these citizens.

I'm not trying to be facetious here. I believe in goodwill first and foremost and doing the right thing over doing nothing, and I always have hope for the best in people. But after 2016, fuck, after January 6th we have to be better than optimistic. We have to hold people accountable, and that means recognizing the actual state of the world we are in, which means recognizing that yes, there are people right now who would argue for a bloodsport. To them it would be bonus points if it was LGBT+ and POC participants.

The only way to come close to changing is by acknowledging our faults as a whole and do as much as we can to remedy them. We have to be compassionate while being completely intolerant of their hateful bullshit and insane rhetoric.

[-] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 10 months ago

gestures around at the lack of empathy tons of people are all proud to display

[-] Goferking0@ttrpg.network 7 points 10 months ago

points at all the anger when making violent sports safer or pointing out the long term damage cause

[-] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

It's easy to forget, but we have the same brains as back then. Societal values may have changed, but there will be those with a sick fascination who want to see. When the bath school massacre happened (1920s I think?) People took home souvenirs.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Nothing suggests to us that the morality of Roman times is capable of existing now. You say “societal values may have changed” but that’s the entire thing. They’ve changed. We have shifted the society to where this kind of public torture would never happen. It can happen again and people are capable, but not unless society shifts.

And the trends show that while people are divisive, their morals are very closely related. You may not agree on abortion but most people agree we shouldn’t kill prisoners inhumanely.

People completely misunderstand morality. People are not currently capable of tolerating this kind of thing. If you think so, do a survey and I’ll eat my hat.

[-] angrystego@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Societal values change all the time and not always for the better. Let's enjoy the values we have now, they might not be present tomorrow.

[-] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

r/watchpeopledie was popular enough to reach the top of r/all quite regularly before NFSW was filtered from it, and had half a million subscribers. There's still plenty people in today's society that would enjoy a medieval style public torture and execution.

[-] set_secret@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Honestly I think you'll find they're not aa different as you wish they were. people are as cruel today as they've ever been.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago

Cruel enough to torture people in public? Get a grip on reality.

[-] set_secret@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

What planet/version of reality are you living on/in? This literally still happens in several counties.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Tell me you've never watched a Republican primary debate without telling me.

Nearly every election cycle there's at least one debate where the death penalty comes up and you have governors competing with each other over body counts to an audience cheering them on.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago

None of what you said represents average people

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

I suspect you overestimate the average person.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Saying that people would enjoy public violence is a pure fantasy. No average person is going to go to an execution, they’re barely even favorable and only because it’s “humane”. Most people are nonviolent. Most people will never see anyone die unexpectedly or intentionally. Most people wont ever seriously injure someone.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Struggle_session

Most people are only non-violent because the violence is socially frowned-upon. When given an acceptable outlet for savagery, humans have no problem being savage.

This is also how riots form.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

What Foucalt gets wrong here is that historically, civilians just enjoy it. They don't find it barbaric or inhumane.

Like there wouldn't be some national conversation about "what have we become" - it'll just be a fun thing people do.

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
177 points (95.4% liked)

News

23287 readers
3738 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS