This saddens me because my right wing buddies warned about how dumb y’all were with the Nazi comparisons.

Perhaps if you even just fucking acknowledge that killing civilian children is a bad thing we'd stop viewing you and your rightwing buddies as nothing more than fascists cheering on a fascist government.

hilariously bad argument

Then why haven't you ACTUALLY addressed it? Your argument is "Killing children is fine so long as we are fighting terrorists". That's not addressing the morality of what Israel is doing, it's giving them a blank check to do whatever in the name of fighting the bad guys.

I highly suggest you talk with someone with war experience by the way

Oh, fuck right off with this. I absolutely have friends with military experience and there is such a thing as "rules of engagement". Guess what wouldn't have happened in the US military? We would not have shot unarmed civilians with their hands up waving a white flag. Perhaps go talk to someone with ACTUAL military experience and not your far right commando buddies who larp as military officers in their camps. You don't shoot until you are shot at. Unless you are israel and you are just trying to kill arabs.

No one likes it when this happens

You sure? You don't seem very upset that this is happening.

These conventions and agreements are far bigger than you or me. It’s not about like or dislike of the rules. I’m just letting ya know what the rules that have been established are.

You like to talk about the Geneva conventions, so how about you fucking read them.

Article 3 https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/geneva-convention-relative-protection-civilian-persons-time-war

In the case of armed conflict not of an international character occurring in the territory of one of the High Contracting Parties, each Party to the conflict shall be bound to apply, as a minimum, the following provisions:

1. Persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria.

To this end, the following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever with respect to the above-mentioned persons:

(a) Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture;

(b) Taking of hostages;

(c) Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment;

(d) The passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.

2. The wounded and sick shall be collected and cared for.

An impartial humanitarian body, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, may offer its services to the Parties to the conflict.

The Parties to the conflict should further endeavour to bring into force, by means of special agreements, all or part of the other provisions of the present Convention.

The application of the preceding provisions shall not affect the legal status of the Parties to the conflict.

Do you see the line in there that says "unless the other side isn't playing dressup, then all bets are off". Because I sure as fuck don't. Israel is killing unarmed civilians. A fact that is undisputed because they fucking killed their own unarmed hostages.

The Geneva convention does not have a "you don't have to follow this if the other side isn't" clause. Or if it does, actually cite it rather than continuing this thread repeating that dumbass line over and over again.