this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
26 points (93.3% liked)
Asklemmy
48789 readers
978 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What is your source for Milgram (and Stanford) not being replicated? As far as I can see, it was, in Burger, Jerry M. (2008) "Replicating Milgram: Would People Still Obey Today?" for example, but also in many different experiments.
I can't really find any sources for the experiment being performed wrongly or disproved or anything. Of course, it's hard to replicate them with current ethical standards being in place, but that's the only thing I could find, not that the experiments themselves weren't valid.
These are relevant.