334
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
334 points (98.3% liked)
politics
19089 readers
3946 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I will agree with you to an extent, but that only stands if all parties are being reasonable (which they are not). It would be more ethical to sue the companies getting paid for the contracts to run the bussed, but I dont think that covers everything New York set out to do.
First, they are betting that the bus companies wont go to bat for the drivers, this effectivly puts the risk of fines on both entities. Ideally this causes the companies to stop accepting the charters at risk of being sued by their own employees for telling them to do something illegal (in a different state). Also stops the drivers from accepting the charters as they likely wont be able to afford the fine, nor the legal fees, it creates too large of a risk for themselves.
Second, this covers politically motivated individuals who want to "volunteer" or any other excuse as to why they are conducting the same actions.
I think its pretty ham-fisted but they wouldent think it was a good idea if the entity it is directed at (Texas) was open to discussing actual solutions.
Exactly. I have no idea if there is merit to the lawsuit but it'll make charter bus companies think twice about accepting contracts to transport migrants across state borders if there is a chance they may be sued and have to deal with the legal cost of defending themselves.