1067

submitted 10 months ago by King@lemy.lol to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

131 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

I'm talking about very large ones where it's basically just a big mind dump. A lot of people talking but not really to each other.

[-] shneancy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

yeah same, if at the bare minimum the chat doesn't come to a natural stop every couple of hours then I'm not going to talk in there

[-] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Define very large, we could be agreeing but I have no idea where your cut-off is

[-] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Hundreds+. I would consider 50, like your Slack group, to be small.

[-] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

You think 50 people in one instant messaging chat room is small? I would consider small to be <10.

Our scales are way off

this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024

1067 points (96.8% liked)

People Twitter

5283 readers

394 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS