141
submitted 10 months ago by PizzaDeposit@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

I assume there must be a reason why sign language is superior but I genuinely don't know why.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 25 points 10 months ago

ASL (or whichever sign language) is NOT a direct visual translation of English or French or Mandarin or whatever. It's a totally different language and the written language is a second language. People might be highly proficient at reading and writing English in an English speaking country but it's a different language.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

And incredibly regional as well.

Any isolated language with a small local population is going to differentiate quickly, and while the Internet is bringing everyone together and making written language more consistent, it's not like deaf people send each other videos online, they just use written English because it's insanely easier and faster for everyone.

[-] Devi@kbin.social -2 points 10 months ago

A decent amount of deaf people don’t speak English so wouldn’t be using written English. Schools that teach both are actually called dual language schools

[-] DeadPand@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago

Deaf people that can’t hear at all, still read and write, please stop speaking for a lifestyle you don’t know anything about.

[-] Devi@kbin.social -2 points 10 months ago

😂 I’m deaf you numpty. There’s entire deaf communities that don’t read or write english. It’s actually a hotly debated topic as some think kids shouldn’t be forced to learn both.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Only in 'murica (and the anglosphere) could people think that learning more languages could possibly be a bad thing...

[-] Devi@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago

I’m not American but it’s suggested that learning a sign language and a ‘spoken’ language at the same time can slow the acquisition of both.

We see it in kids with two ‘spoken’ languages too but I believe to a lesser extent.

If I had a deaf kid I would teach them both but I understand the choices of parents that don’t do that.

[-] DeadPand@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago

What in the world? It’s commonly understood that children learn the fastest and if you want to learn multiple languages, it’s best learned early..

[-] Devi@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

You've got mixed up there. If you plan to learn multiple languages then it is beneficial to learn as a child but even similar languages, like English and French, can cause issues communicating when young. When learning vastly different languages especially when one is written and one signed it causes a lot of issues. This can leave a deaf child struggling to communicate for a time.

Often deaf parents will choose to stick to sign first.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
141 points (98.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43908 readers
1056 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS