148
submitted 9 months ago by dantheclamman@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jonne@infosec.pub 22 points 9 months ago

Good thing China isn't ready to flood the market with millions of cheap electric cars. This short term profit is going to end up biting them in the ass real quick. Although I guess they know they'll just get bailed out, so there's no reason to innovate.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 9 months ago

Most of those Chinese cars wouldn't meet US safety regs. Getting them up to that level would put them closer to cost parity.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 7 points 9 months ago

They sell them in the EU, which has stricter safety regulations. If they set out to do it, they'll flood the market and get the traditional manufacturers in trouble.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 9 months ago

EU allows all sorts of stuff that isn't allowed in the US. Believe it or not, US safety regs are generally higher than the EU (for passengers, anyway). The Ariel Atom, for example, needs some hoop jumping to make it US street legal, but can be driven without issue much of the EU.

[-] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Wow, I didn't realize there were Chinese cars on the European market. Are the cars being received well? Are there major issues with them and if there are major issues, does price still make them worth it?

[-] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They’re surprisingly good, particularly BYD cars, in my experience.

Americans’ vehicles tend to be huge, wildly inefficient for their daily usage, and they throw off externalities like pedestrian and cyclist risks, road damage, and support for countries who use our gas spending to make the world less liberal.

VW, Honda, Toyota, and Datsun capitalized on American vehicle bloat to build massive, multinational companies with products in every segment. The Chinese are going to ruin our domestic manufacturers, once they decide to build bridgehead plants here.

Today, I’m driving an Acura that is made in Marysville, Ohio. Not assembled; it is substantively made here in the States. And, the chain reaction that led to Honda, a Japanese company, exporting profits made from American productivity in 2024, started with the Big Three making massively bloated, inefficient, expensive, poorly designed cars, leaving a gap in the market that foreign companies exploited with right-sized, efficient, affordable, reliable vehicles, starting in the ‘60s and exploding with the ‘73 oil crisis.

I don’t have time to find a link, but there have been studies that demonstrate that the exact choices being made by American manufacturers today—to not fully serve the bottom of the market—sow the seeds of their own future declines in the middle and upper markets.

[-] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I truly feel car manufacturers are doing everything in their power to make sure that I personally regret every car decision I make. I hope a new comer starts at a low price point and eventually takes their higher margin stuff as well.

[-] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

My biggest worry is that once/if the Chinese make cars "good enough for the US market", all car companies lobby for worse consumer protections since those regulations no longer keep new competitors out of the market.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago

I'd be OK with it, but with some caveats. Many US safety regs (and some pollution regs, as well) push things towards larger vehicles in indirect ways. Japanese Kei cars can be perfectly good for city use--not for US highways, but a lot of driving doesn't need to go there--but they would never pass US safety regs. And you don't need to get much bigger than a Kei to have something that works for US highways. Big is only safer for passengers, not for people outside the vehicle.

So if it comes in the context of also getting smaller cars on the road, that would be fine.

[-] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

While I agree with you, big cars are like lawyers. You keep big cars around to protect you from other big cars.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Not really, the big problem is tariffs. You have to do at least final assembly in the US to avoid that.

[-] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 months ago

Not to worry: protectionism will take take of the competition. Just like they did with the Japanese manufacturers...

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Yeah no one drives a Honda or Toyota 🙄🤣

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 3 points 9 months ago

Domestically there's still Tesla, although I guess they decided to do a stupid big truck as well.

[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Cheap labor Conservatives destroyed protectionism. Part of why we're in this giant economic mess is because offshoring wiped our middle class off the map like the Chixclub meteor.

this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
148 points (96.8% liked)

News

23284 readers
3508 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS