361
submitted 9 months ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yes, I understand, but a flat fee regardless of size of car as it now, is effectively a subsidy directly toward the development of car dependent cities. Also families don't tend to travel downtown by car on weekdays where space is a premium, those are usually single drivers going to work and often in NA, those lone drivers are often in large pickups and SUVs.

Large families taking the train have to pay roughly proportionally to the size, which is one of many reasons why many families opt for car culture. It's not those fault the options are this way but my point is that it can be changed.

[-] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

I agree that in this particular case it makes sense. But the person that responded to said that everywhere should adopt this rule.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

(I was that person 😉). I suppose everywhere was a bit broad of wording. Where space isn't a premium, parking is often free anyway so I wasn't really including that. Like a Costco or Walmart wouldn't have any good reason to have someone just to go around measuring people's cars.

[-] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Well that’s what I get for not checking usernames lol anyway glad to see it’s not as strict as it sounded.

this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
361 points (98.7% liked)

World News

32326 readers
415 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS