207
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago

Which data were they negligent with? I thought it was breaches on other sites that gave reused passwords.

[-] Hegar@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Credential stuffing is a well understood part of the threat landscape that 23 and me negligently failed to account for, allowing hackers to access 7 million people's info after hacking only 14 thousand users.

[-] jimbo@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago

...because those 7 million people opted into sharing their data with everyone else.

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago

No, they opted to share varying degrees of information with authorized users and close genetic matches, and 23andMe failed to protect them from a large scale takeover of accounts that made public the kind of information the company had promised to keep private to semi-private.

14,000 accounts compromise by the same entity. That's absolutely the fault of the platform, not the users.

[-] jimbo@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You're making a distinction without a difference. Nobody has any fucking clue who their "genetic match" will be nor does anyone have any fucking clue who else is using 23andMe. Sharing that information with other 23andMe users is not meaningfully different than just sharing it with the world at large.

[-] Hegar@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago

It's not the responsibility of your grandma who's researching family history to be aware of potential data security threats. It's the responsibility of the multimillion dollar online company with massive, valuable data troves to not offer a feature that was just a data breach waiting to happen.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I remember when the housing market crashed and hearing all these rich folks talk about how it is poor people who are responsible for not knowing they couldnt afford their homes.

Yeah so why exactly do we have a credit rating system if it isn't rating credit?

You are completely correct. It is not on regular people to be experts on cyber security and somehow know that the company is doing their job and will do their job forever.

[-] tiredofsametab@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago

There are still all kinds of things a company can do to mitigate at least some of this. New browser, new location, forced two-factor auth, etc.

this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
207 points (96.8% liked)

News

23301 readers
3560 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS