1453
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

Maybe we'll see planned communities pop up that pool resources and create their own "circular economy". Certain things are incredibly cheap today, e.g. learning how to do things. And technology can make certain basics needed to live very cheap. Food, water, energy, housing, education, safety, medical, community.

If you could e.g. buy some farmland and build a compact apartment block out of e.g. shipping containers (or something even cheaper) then you could produce your own food, have your own school (partially over internet), a doctor / medic, and have workshops to make and maintain whatever you need.

Maybe the "buy in" costs for each person could be pretty low, like 10-20k.

A kind of "democratization" of economy for the basic needs. The global economy is completely out of whack because nobody can compete with mass produced garbage and marketing, so our work is getting worth less and less and we're getting poorer.

[-] Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago

That sounds like a commune with extra steps.

[-] deus@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago
[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah ok sure, but this site has shown me theres a good reason to distrust someone who call themselves a communist. China and Russia are TERRIBLE examples of where the world should head, yet a LOT of the communists on this site are Tankies

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

My example is explicitly not "state-socialism" (where all economic power is concentrated in the hands of very few) and most socialists think Russia is a far right government. Unfortunately the hardened battle lines make it very hard to discuss the failures of either state socialism or plutocracy, while pretty much all agree that massive concentration of economic power is shit.

But on a small scale like a planned community these things actually do work much better.

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Gasp! Sir, this is a micro-federation of free people! :D

I don't really care what you call it, it shouldn't be about ideology but about economy benefit and freedom from economic exploitation. But you'll definitely be facing anti-socialist propaganda. It's possible that certain advances in technology allow for a life in relative luxury (e.g. rich in free time, rich in stability, rich in self determination). Things like 3D printers don't quite get us there, but if you could invent / develop or genetically engineer access to raw materials. You'd still need quite a few "vitamins" like microprocessors etc so you'd still need to import some stuff and export some labour or goods.

[-] Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

So... A commune then... I'm sorry I'm not trying to troll you, but you quite literally are defining a commune.

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Not exactly, the proper umbrella term would be "intentional community" and there are many forms that would not fit that label.

PS: Mostly I'd avoid that term because of the negative propaganda. You see OP, everyone agrees shit is ridiculously bad, then you see accusations of being a "tankie" when you suggest any alternative. But there are also many (failed) social engineering ideas that are associated with communes.

[-] Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

We are saying the same thing here man, you're just not wanting to say commune because it's too close to the word communism... When a commune doesn't strictly mean a communist village.

The wikipedia you linked to even says that it's a synonym for a commune.

Also being a tankie is way different than wanting more progressive legislation. Though I understand your point.

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Yes you're right, unfortunately I failed haha. The wikipedia article even says "Also the alternative term commune is considered to be non-neutral or even linked to leftist politics or hippies."

[-] Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

You failed at nothing friend. We were just getting on the same page, and giving two labels for the same thing.

[-] gilokee@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago
[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Definitely! But most solarpunk I've seen isn't realistic about the amount of land you need to produce enough calories for food.

this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
1453 points (96.7% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9773 readers
196 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS