913
submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] einat2346@lemmy.today 101 points 10 months ago

Influencer or not, however, those who stream videos of themselves being fired from their job risk facing repercussions, such as violating severance agreements, the BBC reported. Job termination videos can also backfire on those who post them if viewers find the post vindictive or unprofessional.

"Generally speaking, such moves are a double-edged sword. The literature on whistleblowers, a more extreme form of publicly sharing bad practices, shows that people get stigmatized for doing so," Ben Voyer, an ESCP Business School professor who founded the Gen Z Observatory, told Business Insider in a recent article.

"Generally, society doesn't reward people that engage in behaviors that some may see as a betrayal. Pushing such content online is a way to get moral support on the one hand, and a little revenge on the other hand," he said.

If you're confused about who to blame, remember that one side debates on whether they should purchase a mega yacht, or have a more reasonable "support" yacht trailing the main one for their helicopter/staff.

[-] Tamo240@programming.dev 47 points 10 months ago

Not even Millennials see action against your employer as 'betrayal'. Company loyalty is dead, and this professor is out of touch.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

Pretty sure the betrayal is for future employers that may look you up

[-] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

You're not reading well. Wrong side.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

Not having a problem with something and noting a possible risk aren’t exclusive

[-] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

Which side the betrayal is being called.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 months ago

Company loyalty when you are getting fired is something really weird. What would it even be based on? I understand parting on good terms etc, but loyalty? There wouldn't be any space for loyalty in such a situation even in feudal contracts.

[-] Clent@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago

If the majority do it, it can no longer be extreme.

I'm enjoying the generational divide coming from Gen-Z.

Previous generations wanting to avoiding "burning bridges" only served corporate interests.

Workers need stop fearing our corporate overlords. We out number them.

They've manipulated the political process to shattered the social contract and must be held accountable.

I'm still partial to dragging them into the street since it worked quite well a century but this is a good step towards lighting that powder keg.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

As a millennial I fucking love gen z

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -1 points 10 months ago

I’m still partial to dragging them into the street since it worked quite well a century but this is a good step towards lighting that powder keg.

What exactly worked quite well? The USSR and other "socialist" countries worked well only for those outside their territory, acting as some kind of counterbalance, I'll admit that.

What was inside was an even more extreme form of what you call "corporate overlords", because there wasn't even an illusion of choice, your path changing employers would be similar to transferring between places in a military, the new employer would see every shitty thing the previous one decided to write about you, and they wouldn't care what you have to say about that generally.

[-] Clent@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

You seem to have taken this comment in some random direction that is pro-capitalism

I am not going to take the time to go through all the scenarios as to how violent uprisings resulted in the standards or work we have today simply because you can't understand a common idiom.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -2 points 10 months ago

simply because you can’t understand a common idiom.

I understand plenty, miss some, and also there are people not worth understanding.

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

risk facing repercussions, such as violating severance agreements

oh no, I won't get dick shit, which is exactly what I was going to get anyway. What a gigantic shame

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

I was watching Wendover's billionaire social calendar last night. They have ships whose sole purpose is to transport their yachts from the Mediterranean to the Caribbean so they don't have to deal with actual transoceanic sailing. Like they literally load the yacht onto the ship like a big cargo rig.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

Yeah most people probably already had the double edged sword in their teeth. Shitty professor is out of touch.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 months ago

Generally, society doesn’t reward people that engage in behaviors that some may see as a betrayal.

The gall to speak like that of somebody publicizing the way one of their contacts with equal sides was terminated. Not even "mutual betrayal", LOL.

It sucks when people think an organization has more rights than a person. If there's a contract between two, then they are on the same level.

[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

CBS News. Viacom. I wonder who benefits from making these threats against these kids.. hmmm

this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
913 points (97.7% liked)

News

23655 readers
2730 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS