453
quick reminder (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by hairinmybellybutt@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Personal property is for personal use. That's it.

Once you start to accumulate surplus property then its very obviously not personal anymore. A person that doesn't want a garden won't have one to sell you, because they wouldn't have one in the first place.

Don't think in terms of "right" and "wrong". Think materially.

[-] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

what if their father left them the garden and they want to sell it to me? what if they want to move somewhere else and they decide to sell me their property?

[-] Squizzy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Inheritance is antithetical to meritocracy is the basis for generational wealth and capitalist dynasties.

Everything must go, use it lose it.

[-] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

What even is your motivation to do more than the bare minimum to survive if not to leave it to your children? I would rather take care of my kids future than let some corrupt government do it who will prioritize their children over mine

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

You can't even imagine helping your neighbors, huh?

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You overestimate how much the average person cares for people they don’t know.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago
[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I wish the truth was different…

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It is! Humans are naturally cooperative and empathetic, we aren't selfish assholes that only care about our immediate families.

Empathy is a skill. It atrophies under capitalism, but it could be trained and flourish under different conditions.

[-] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

From wikipedia:

Ancient views of greed abound in nearly every culture. In Classical Greek thought; pleonexy (an unjust desire for tangible/intangible worth attaining to others) is discussed in the works of Plato and Aristotle.[9] Pan-Hellenic disapprobation of greed is seen by the mythic punishment meted to Tantalus, from whom ever-present food and water is eternally withheld. Late-Republican and Imperial politicians and historical writers fixed blame for the demise of the Roman Republic on greed for wealth and power, from Sallust and Plutarch[10] to the Gracchi and Cicero. The Persian Empires had the three-headed Zoroastrian demon Aži Dahāka (representing unslaked desire) as a fixed part of their folklore. In the Sanskrit Dharmashastras the "root of all immorality is lobha (greed).",[11] as stated in the Laws of Manu (7:49).[12] In early China, both the Shai jan jing and the Zuo zhuan texts count the greedy Taotie among the malevolent Four Perils besetting gods and men. North American Indian tales often cast bears as proponents of greed (considered a major threat in a communal society).[13] Greed is also personified by the fox in early allegoric literature of many lands.[14][15]

Greed (as a cultural quality) was often imputed as a racial pejorative by the ancient Greeks and Romans; as such it was used against Egyptians, Punics, or other Oriental peoples;[16] and generally to any enemies or people whose customs were considered strange. By the late Middle Ages the insult was widely directed towards Jews.[17]

In the Books of Moses, the commandments of the sole deity are written in the book of Exodus (20:2-17), and again in Deuteronomy (5:6-21); two of these particularly deal directly with greed, prohibiting theft and covetousness. These commandments are moral foundations of not only Judaism, but also of Christianity, Islam, Unitarian Universalism, and the Baháʼí Faith among others. The Quran advises do not spend wastefully, indeed, the wasteful are brothers of the devils..., but it also says do not make your hand [as though] chained to your neck..."[18] The Christian Gospels quote Jesus as saying, ""Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; a man's life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions",[19] and "For everything in the world—the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life—comes not from the Father but from the world.".[20]

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

That's not "human nature", that's an evolutionary eye blink! Do you think people 50,000 years ago had concepts like that? Absolutely not!

[-] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago

Yes they did. Dogs are greedy. Monkeys are greedy. You dont get far in this world if you dont have some sort of greed baked into your genes.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

You aren't a dog and you aren't a monkey.

Human nature is to cooperate and share among the tribe, and the tribe is basically just "anyone who lives in the same place." Yes, maybe expanding the tribe to include "everyone everywhere" is beyond human nature, but we're extremely good at welcoming new people into the tribe. There are countless examples throughout all of human history of new people being welcomed in despite being different, and that's so very different from basically the rest of the animal kingdom. Humans are amazing, stop being a misanthrope.

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

MFW we’re trying to compare a small tribe to a countries spanning landmasses…

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

Now you're just highlighting how unnatural human lives are, which makes the entire "human nature" talking point irrelevant anyway!

Every civilization in history has thought of itself and everything it does as natural or ordained by god or somehow fated. It's all bullshit.

[-] yeather@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 year ago

In the entirety of human history communism has never worked. Not once has any society been able to work on the ideals of it.

[-] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's impossible to uncouple society from capitalism. It's not a possibility, but it definitely could work. Maybe capitalism just needs longer than communism to fail?

The wealthiest country in the world has unaffordable healthcare and homelessness, how is that capitalism working?

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, because the US bombs them or funds terror cells or blockades their economy.

Cold War. Communism was hunted and destroyed whereever it arose.

[-] yeather@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 year ago

If communism was so strong it wouldn't have to worry about capitalist intervention. You just proved my point of communism / socialism being weak if the apparent enemy is easily able to wreck you economy and implode your country it is not a strong system.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] yeather@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

In terms of global politics, yes. Every country has fallen back into capitalism in some form, the closest I can think of being truly, actually communist were the Spanish Anarchists based out of Barcelona during the Spanish Civil War. If you would like to read about them I recommend George Orwell's "Homage to Catalonia." Everyone made the same amount, they called each other comrade regardless of rank, etc. They did not last long though, taken out by their own democratic allies during the Civil War.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I disagree. Countries controlled by communist parties today have retreated from socialism by enacting market reforms, but they haven't fallen. A fallen revolution wouldn't bother to call itself communist anymore.

China, in particular, seems to be on a good trajectory and has made a lot of progress towards socialism. There's a reason they tried harder than pretty much every other country on Earth to save their people during the pandemic, despite how much that might have hurt their economy.

China isn't communist, but it's progressive and they're getting there. The revolution just isn't over yet 😘

[-] yeather@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

China is in no way shape or form socialist lmao. They're just another flavor of authoritarian capitalist. If you really think the PRC will every make any meaningful attempts to improve or become more progressive then you are very delusional. The PRC is probably the farthest from progressive you can get. It's a brutal and unforgiving regime.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Zero COVID proves China is literally different than every other capitalist nation on Earth. Even if you don't believe the official data, the excess death rate (i.e. something they can't hide) shows they beat pretty much everyone other than extreme outliers like New Zealand.

[-] yeather@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I just googled China COVID Death rate and every story is about China underreporting at every step of the process. The fact you believe anything coming from that government is sad and stupid. China trying to pass off zero COVID deaths is just another indicator at a failing state under an oppressive and deadly regime.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

The excess death rate, again something that can't be faked, proves China outperformed everyone else.

They can lie an say a death from COVID was actually a heart attack or a stroke or the flu, but they can't just disappear bodies and pretend they're still alive.

[-] yeather@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/19/world/asia/china-covid-data-toll.html

https://time.com/6247534/china-covid-death-toll-underreporting/

https://www.irishtimes.com/world/asia-pacific/2023/07/18/china-deletes-data-on-covid-19-deaths/

Here's three articles on the messing with COVID numbers and hiding true death counts. It's incredibly easy to hide true death tolls in such a large country that's effectively cut off from the rest of the world's news. If you control the data being pushed out and there's a severe lack of checking if they're true or not, it's incredibly easy to hide deaths, either misreporting them like you mentioned or just not reporting them at all. Current US death rates from COVID are 1 million, while investigations form the NYT reports at least triple that in China, if not more. Again, failed state under an oppressive and deadly regime.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Manipulating COVID death counts isn't disappearing the actual deaths themselves. We know deaths still happened, like the Time article said "China’s True COVID Death Toll Estimated To Be in Hundreds of Thousands" - so let us assume that's completely true!

1.4 billion people live in China. The fact that only a few hundred thousand died is a miracle that almost no other country can match when you actually start comparing numbers directly. China outperformed everyone else when you measure how many people died against how many people didn't die. If China just let er rip like America did, over 6 million would have died. Think about that.

[-] yeather@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

You misread the article, that hundreds of thousands statistic is only for the most recent batch of COVID. Also, if China and the US are comparable, it would be about 4 million. If China was comparable to another country, like say Ireland, it would be around 2.5 million. My figure of about 3 million seems accurate enough for this argument. Your devotion to this regime is unfortunate, you should consider reevaluating your decisions and take a fresh look at the awfulness that happens to the people of China everyday.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

I can't read the NYT article because it's behind a paywall lol

Gotta love western "freedom of press"

[-] Squizzy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So what are all those people without kids doing?

Make a better world, build a stronger economy for them excel in and make their own way. I plan on providing the very best for my children to let them go about their life as they see fit and not have to rely on something I might pass down.

Corrupt governments is a cop out statement too, ideally you wouldn't stand for government corruption.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] automaton@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Who decides what constitutes surplus?

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 year ago

The democratically elected central committee, or some other process whereby everyone decides together what our fair share is.

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
453 points (77.5% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1223 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS