273
DeSantis doubles down on claim that some Blacks benefited from slavery
(www.washingtonpost.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
273 points (96.6% liked)
News
23296 readers
3298 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
What if you're not white and vote for him, or if you're white and not a SuPrEmAcIsT? I'm not voting for him but I am curious on where the answer stands with these two scenarios.
If you watch someone piss in a milk carton and then offer you a bowl of cereal the next morning, and you accept, it’s because you’re either into it or really, really out of it.
I like this answer best.
Well this didn't have to do with either and didn't happen so I can't really respond to this fake scenario.
Nobody expects you to understand a metaphor. It's for the rest of us to lol at.
Fake scenarios like asking 'what if I support a bigot without being a bigot?'
FFS, use your fucking brain, man!
Some republicans aren't hateful bigots. Some of them are ignorant morons.
I can agree to this, you make a very good point. I'm neither dem or repub I just like to ask questions.
You sound like that dumb fuck Alex Jones.
Yes, we know your type.
If you saw a house burning down and you did nothing to stop the flames, wouldn't you say that that person wanted the house to burn down?
If you are not actively against white supremacists, you are allowing them to spread and flourish. It's like a weed. If you don't pull it, it's going to take over your beds.
why the fuck are you voting for someone who made his own private militarized police force to protect his interests like a stereotypical cold war era dictator
People who aren't into white-supremacy are not the target audience of his imagined fond recollections of some ancestor's plantation.
Fair enough point.
Lol