1034
submitted 9 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 9 months ago

I have to admit, one of my first emotional responses was anger. I want vengeance. When will we see the day the bullies, abusers, murderers, and their enablers receive justice?

Not civilized "justice" in court rooms, on pieces of paper, with well-dressed men and women arguing politely over legal arcana.

Blood for blood. There should be a mortal fear that if they harm one hair on our heads, something worse will happen to them by far.

Don't tell me this won't bring anyone back. Don't tell me to be better than our enemies. If you will assault someone over their skin color, gender, sexual orientation, you don't deserve the breath of life.

[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 42 points 9 months ago

The problem with mob justice is lack of due process. It frequency gets the wrong person as it can't be reasoned with.

[-] hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The problem with mob justice is that it can be leveraged directly in to fascism. This is exactly what happened with the French Revolution and the Soviet one. In both cases valid anger against oppression was directed in to paranoia that allowed for the reestablishment of an authoritarian order instead of liberation. Anger is foolish and easily manipulated. That's why it's the only emotion the right wants anyone to experience. That's why it's the only emotion patriarchy allows men to express.

Anger is good for destroying things. Some things need to be destroyed. But those things that need to be destroyed are systems, not people.

Anger is activating and should absolutely drive you to action, but the action you take shouldn't also be decided by the anger. Let anger wake you up, and compassion guide the action you take.

[-] Dragster39@feddit.de 8 points 9 months ago

History repeats itself, at least most of the time. That's why we should learn from the past because humans haven't changed that much in the way we think under certain circumstances.

[-] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 9 months ago

No, I'm sorry, if a person was bullied for a year, that was the time for "due process" to protect them and society by preventing further harm. Now it is too late.

They caused someone to die by their violent actions, I am fully in favor of violent retaliation here, and as I said not looking to be convinced otherwise.

There are some things our society gets right, and some things it gets wrong. Passivity in the face of violence is a mistake IMO.

[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's never too late for justice to be done. Though more of it has to done the later it is left. No one is talking passivity here. Everyone wants something done this time and done sooner next time.

Mob justice is not justice at all.

Edit: english

[-] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago
[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago
[-] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago
[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 0 points 9 months ago

That is mob rule. It's not the rule of law.

[-] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

That is not what mob rule is, and this literally has nothing to do with government

[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago

Mob rule is the breakdown of law and order. Which a failing of governance.

[-] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

You mean like we have now with psychotic and treasonous christofascists trying to destroy freedom while you complain about "law and order"?

You have never existed in the real world, buddy

[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago

Freedom doesn't exist without law and order. Mobs lynch wrong people as often as not. It's why the legal system should be above politics. It amazes me America has politically appointed judges. The judiciary should be separate from, and independent of, the government. If the legal system doesn't work, law and order can break down and you get anarchy.

[-] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Hey you're starting to get it!

[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago

Then as long as we agree anarchy is bad we basically are agreeing.

[-] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Anarchy is indeed bad. Unfortunately you don't seem to grasp what anarchy is. Hint: it's not street justice.

[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago

Street "justice" is a break down of law and order. No one is accountable for the mob and is not held to any rules. How is that an outbreak of anarchy?

[-] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

You really are desperate to defend fascists, aren't you?

[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago

Really not, screw them, but with a functioning justice system. Mob justice is no justice at all.

[-] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Your "law and order":

This Black History Month remember human trafficking was legal. Slavery was legal. Jim Crow was legal. US Govt paying reparations to white enslavers but not to the enslaved was legal. Prison slavery still IS legal.

Do not let legality & power be a measure of morality & justice. -Qasim Rashid

[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago

Law isn't perfect, and must constantly be challenged, but law based democracy is the best society humans have come up with. Plenty of bad law, for example, the war on drugs is stupid, like prohibition alcohol was. But mob lynching can do be part of any justice system.

[-] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

You sound like a guy who'd be trying to reason with Nazi Stormtroopers as they were shoving you into the boxcar. No great injustices were ever solved through nonviolent means. None.Power does not abdicate itself because you begged for it to.

[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago

The Nazi haven't taken over law yet. In the UK at least, they are going to be losing a lot of power next election. The US is looking screwed. As always, I'm glad I don't live there.

[-] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Do you know how many times we heard that they were gonne lose the next election?...or that they couldn't possibly pass such a bill here? UK is at even greater risk from what I gather.

[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago

Even they think they are going to lose the election. They are so far behind in the polls, both opinion and by-elections, it will take quite an event to change things.

[-] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

Yeah, and if you remove justice by due process by installing fascist bigots in all positions of the judicial system, then all you're left with is mob justice. And we ought to be angry about that too.

[-] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 31 points 9 months ago

It's a social contract thing. Conservatives insist on being granted all of the benefits you get by signing an accord with the rest of us, but then act as though they are exempt from it's requirements.

As far as I'm concerned, they aren't covered by the agreement anymore, and should be deprived of any protection offered by it.

this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
1034 points (95.2% liked)

News

23376 readers
2161 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS