1650
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
1650 points (96.1% liked)
Work Reform
9857 readers
130 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I read your comment, but I disagree that pointing to a common working class is "kind of silly." It does not erase anything else you said. It's just one category.
The point is we all sell our labour for money, and we can never stop doing that - not how much money we get in exchange for our labour.
I guess I wasn't clear with that statement. It's claiming that the recognition of these differences is a conspiracy to keep us down that I think is silly.
I figured that would be obvious because that is what the tweet is about, but I guess I should have been more clear.
I don't see any reason to bring conspiracies into it, it's just the way people are socialised to think of poorer workers as inferior, or workers with the most perks as the "betters." I'm not accusing you of this, but it's a part of the same dividing principle outlined in the op.
Like I'm sitting at 6 figures fucking around on my phone while someone fixes my dishwasher downstairs, so I'm feeling the privilege intensely atm. I recognise there are real, material differences between individual workers.
However when talking about class specifically, I think it's very important that we don't muddy the waters between workers.
I think that's what's got people (myself included) riled up by your comment.
This is my point. The submission is about this important recognition being a conspiracy to keep us down. I think that's silly.
Well that's where we disagree then
So you think claiming that these terms were made up by the owning class in order to divide the working class is not a conspiracy theory? What is it then?
An ideology which serves the owners and is propagated by they and us, for reasons both cynical and genuine. But ultimately, I believe, serves the owners best.
Blatantly dodging the question
I'll speak more plainly. No, It's not a conspiracy, it's an ideology
Oh, I see now. Can a conspiracy theory be an ideology then? Like I could agree that it's both an ideology (a weird one, how it serves the owning class, I have no idea) and a conspiracy theory. But I still don't see how it isn't a conspiracy theory.