215

Reversal of smoking ban criticised as ‘shameful’ for lacking evidence

New Zealand is repealing the world’s first smoking ban passed under former prime minister Jacinda Arden’s government to pave the way for a smoke-free generation amid backlash from researchers and campaigners over its risk to Indigenous people.

The new coalition government led by prime minister Christopher Luxon confirmed the repeal will happen on Tuesday, delivering on one of the actions of his coalition’s ambitious 100-day plan.

The government repeal will be put before parliament as a matter of urgency, enabling it to scrap the law without seeking public comment, in line with previously announced plans.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Oh, another "oh yeah, it totally says the opposite of what it concludes but I can't actually explain how". I'm shocked.

I'm gonna place a personal bet that you haven't even looked at any of it. Trying to argue "we haven't proved tobacco smoke is harmful" in 2024. You're cracking me up, man.

Is smoking harmful? No, it's the science which is wrong!

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago

Comment looks pretty dumb now huh? I quote you the report and you claim I'm the one not reading it

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yes, all of your comments do look pretty dumb. That's why I keep engaging with you. You're veeerry entertaining. :D

You haven't made an argument.

Linking a piece showing they've looked at lifetime smokers and then you making an indoor/outdoor argument when the conclusions say "REGARDLESS OF LOCATION", is pretty funny.

You still don't have an argument.

This is funny, but it's also sad to see that while the science is very clear on the subject, there are still trolls like you.

This isn't a debate any more than "the Earth is actually flat" is.

I could link you literally thousands upon thousands od studies showing how harmful smoke is and you can't link a single one showing it isn't, and you're not making any rational point about this one either.

It's funny, but also, slightly worrying.

this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
215 points (96.1% liked)

worldnews

4836 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil. Disagreements happen, that does not give you the right to personally insult each other.

  2. No racism or bigotry.

  3. Posts from sources that aren't known to be incredibly biased for either side of the spectrum are preferred. If this is not an option, you may post from whatever source you have as long as it is relevant to this community.

  4. Post titles should be the same as the article title.

  5. No spam, self-promotion, or trolling.

Instance-wide rules always apply.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS