420
submitted 8 months ago by gedaliyah@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

A painting of Lord Balfour housed at the University of Cambridge’s Trinity College was slashed by protest group Palestine Action.

The painting of Lord Balfour was made in 1914 by Philip Alexius de László inside Trinity College. The Palestine Action group specifically targeted the Lord Balfour painting, describing his declaration as the beginning of “ethnic cleansing of Palestine by promising the land away—which the British never had the right to do.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 62 points 8 months ago

Take a look at everyone clutching their pearls over this painting and think about what doesn't upset them

[-] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Oh no, a painting! So much more important and relatable than children dying. That happens all the time.

/s

Edit: I'm agreeing with the above point, folks. Lives are more important than paintings. We need a lot more outrage about people dying and less about property damage.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 23 points 8 months ago

Has this prevented any kids from dying? Or is it in addition to children dying? Can people be upset at two (or even... three!) things at the same time?

[-] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I agree with your point, but want to highlight that at no point did I suggest people can't be upset about multiple things. No offense intended toward you personally (or anyone really), but your response now seems to be the standard reaction to shut down anyone pointing out the disparity in media/public reaction between things like people dying or being repressed and material goods being vandalized or destroyed. It's getting better, but the theme of reporting tended to be that property damage is a tragic loss of irreplaceable treasure, while genocide was more akin to "some people went to sleep and didn't wake up again, maybe they should have complied".

Of course people can be upset by multiple things. When the magnitude of upset over precious but ultimately replaceable things being destroyed is greater than that for irreplaceable people being destroyed, then we have a problem.

At least that's my take and I'm anything but infallible.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 8 months ago

I get your point, but on the other hand, I understood your first comment as "There's children dying, so you're not allowed to be upset by anything lesser than that", which is also used to shut down dissent.

Anyways, thanks for the Level-headed answer, have a good one!

[-] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Totally understandable, there's always a risk that a quick, snappy comment conveys the wrong meaning. My wording definitely could have been better, but I'm leaving it for posterity so future generations might learn to do better.

And thanks to you too! Good conversation.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago

to shut down anyone pointing out the disparity in media/public reaction between things like people dying or being repressed and material goods being vandalized or destroyed

The OP is even linking to artnet because this does not seem to be a major story outside of this. I probably would have never heard about this had I not read it on lemmy. I listen to NPR on my way to work, I regularly hear about the horrors the people in Gaza are facing. So I'm not sure this characterization is fair.

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

The Israeli army is retreating in fear. Now it's a painting, next time they might smash a vase!

The thing is that the is plain useless. Nobody is going to have a change of heart because somebody slashed a painting. If anything I think it can have a slight effect on the opposite direction.

It's also very interesting, some people defending this action and upset about Israels invasion seem very chill about Russia's invasion...

[-] absentbird@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You're getting down voted, but you're absolutely right. Zionists will use this as another excuse to ignore the movement, while it does nothing to help the Palestinian people.

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah. I think so many people just have this "it's for a good reason", and don't consider if it's useful if even positive for them.

Might have have a better impact to force them through social movement to remove the painting. Achieving that would have been a much stronger message.

Still I think most downvotes come from people that don't like I've brought up Russia's invasion as something negative.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee -5 points 8 months ago

If they punched a baby, instead, which is actually better than what's going Gaza, would it be wrong for people to be upset about them taking it out on something that has nothing to do with the criminals they are protesting?

It's a dumb thing they did and they are a piece of shit. But what Israel is doing is Gaza is infinitely worse. It completely reasonable and easy to hold these two positions at the same time.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 20 points 8 months ago

Uh... Balfour definitely has something to do with Israel.

this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
420 points (93.9% liked)

World News

39000 readers
3059 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS