281
Young people becoming less happy than older generations, research shows
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
281 points (98.3% liked)
News
23600 readers
3773 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Everything's unaffordable, the world is on fire and we're doing somewhere between "too little, too late" and "nothing", you can barely own anything anymore (only subscribe/rent), owning a house is a pipe dream for many, on top of all that, the Nazis are back, and more.
But yeah, let's blame social media for the kids being unhappy. If they don't know about all this bad stuff, they won't be unhappy about it. Genius!
Have they finally moved on from blaming video games for everything?
Video games: one of the few things I can afford that bring me joy.
The irony being the video game industry is currently one of the most unstable and corrupt industries right now. Video game CEOs are raking in money while the actual creatives are being fired left and right. There is serious brain drain and a mental health crisis is occurring.
Thankfully the video game industry is huge and never been more varied. You can mostly ignore major publishers and still have a great time exploring indie and AA games. It still really sucks for the majority of the game devs but at least for players they have a lot of options if they can be steered away from the gambling of things like mobile games, FIFA and MTX-ridden AAA games.
On the other hand though, the industry is rapidly unionizing to stop the problems you're talking about
Vidya games? Banned! For the children, naturally.
Social media is what's making us aware of all those things concurrently. Continuously.
It is (that, and 24/7 news). I'm not qualified to debate the health effects of social media on the adolescent (or adult) mind, but I still find it disingenuous and tone deaf to blame it instead of the problems it's merely highlighting.
Maybe in the younger people, pre-teens, teens, it has a bigger impact. They might not pay as much attention to politics and the news.
However, on social media you only see the positive parts of people's lives. You don't see the negative parts so often. People's lives look so much better than ours. Plus there's all the bullying aspect.
When you're a teen with self esteem issues, these things can really get to you.
Then again, like you said, I'm no expert.
People see the harms of social media but forget how connected it can help make people. There's a LOT of people who would be stuck, isolated from any peers without social media. It's why shitheels like DeSantis wanting to block kids from accessing social media is not a welcome change. There's a lot of vulnerable people who would otherwise stay uninformed and sheltered without it. It certainly has it's downsides but people could say the same thing about the internet itself and no one's calling to ban that.
the best thing the internet did was connect all the "smart" people to each other. the worst thing the internet did was connect all the "dumb" people to each other.
All the idiots of the world have found each other and unionized
Unionized is not the right word. They found leaders. Then they voted against unions.
Definitely not equating what these people are doing to real unions, but they do form semi organized groups with leaders and push for whatever agenda (dumb as it may be) they have which is essentially unionizing by definition.
Big Social Media shares many characteristics of a drug, with similar anti-social consequences by overuse. But as with drugs, social media is just a symptom of the underlying problem.
Pick any point in the last hundred years and you'll have the world coming apart because of global conflict, assassinations and bombings, or the threat of nuclear catastrophe, all under a backdrop of environmental destruction and pollution. Despite all this the previous generation is reported to be happier
Everything you listed is legit, but it's our ability to serve up fresh horrors at all hours of the day that has changed.
What's worse, is that social media gives us the feeling that we're well informed when we're actually not. Think of all the people you know who you think are well informed. Journalists, experts, even some bloggers. They didn't get that way by scrolling for content on social media all the time.
All that to say that I think anyone who uses social media should consider how their media diet effects them
On a personal level it's one of the reasons I try to use things like reddit (or Lemmy) less and fill my life with things that are more enriching, like books and music
Or maybe...... JUST maybe...... its because COL was cheaper for older generations and they made more money to boot
Having time and money to travel, own a car, and own a house at the same time on a minimum wage job was entirely possible in the 1950s.
I'd just like to mention that that is a very US-centric perspective. Of course it's not social media, but in the 1950s the average person who was just graduating from the place I did was fighting the 8th Mechanized Army of the Soviet Union. Things did not improve immediately after.
Point is, the relative welfare of the US was built on the fact that Europe was devastated in WWII, and then squandered once the wealthy saw they can't keep accumulating wealth at the same pace after Europe was back in one piece.
That said, the boom-bust cycle is seeing us worse and worse every iteration and the 100 obscenely wealthy people better and better off. So maybe that's the problem.