417
submitted 8 months ago by FirstCircle@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

On Wednesday, the Republican Study Committee, of which some three-quarters of House Republicans are members, released its 2025 budget entitled “Fiscal Sanity to Save America.” Tucked away in the 180-page austerity manifesto is a block of text concerned with a crucial priority for the party: ensuring children aren’t being fed at school.

Eight states offer all students, regardless of household income, free school meals — and more states are trending in the direction. But while people across the country move to feed school children, congressional Republicans are looking to stop the cause.

Republicans however view the universal version of the policy as fundamentally wasteful. The “school lunch and breakfast programs are subject to widespread fraud and abuse,” reads the RSC’s proposed yearly budget, quoting a report from the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. The Cato report blames people who may “improperly” redeem free lunches, even if they are technically above the income cutoff levels. The “fraudulence” the think tank is concerned about is not some shadowy cabals of teachers systematically stealing from the school lunch money pot: It’s students who are being fed, even if their parents technically make too much to benefit from the program. In other words, Republicans’ opposition to the program is based on the assumption that people being “wrongly” fed at school is tantamount to abusive waste.

Not to be confused as completely frugal, the Republicans call to finish construction of border wall projects proposed by former President Donald Trump. And not to be confused as focused, the budget includes the word “woke” 37 times.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 42 points 8 months ago

Why the fuck is it so important to you freaks that children don't eat food?

[-] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 18 points 8 months ago
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago

Does the Devil pay you a dollar everytime a starving kid gets hunger pangs?

[-] Kata1yst@kbin.social 10 points 7 months ago

Cruelty is the point.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 10 points 7 months ago

Because feeding and supporting children doesn't get their single-issue voters to the polls the way forcing them to be born does. Once the child is born they are no longer of political value to Republicans.

this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
417 points (98.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7210 readers
268 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS