16
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Interesting thought. So you think that they don't expect the decision to be overturned here, but for a judgment to explain why this case requires better consultation but other somewhat less disruptive buildings might not?

[-] cloaker@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I think they're hoping for an overturn of the idea entirely, giving them free reign to make their own policies. Meaning when they break it there's no accountability.

If they can't convince the court that they should be allowed to govern freely I think that what you've suggested would be their compromise.

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

Brisbane

962 readers
9 users here now

Home of the bin chicken. Visit our friends:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS