70
submitted 7 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

“State transportation agencies are the recipients of the money,” he said. “Nearly all of them had no experience deploying electric vehicle charging stations before this law was enacted.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago

Mass Public Transport > Electric Cars.

Electric car support will take a short while to implement, but fossil fuel reduction will take a long time to show and a long time to be significant.

But Mass Public Transport takes a long while to implement and savings are quick to show, that would be because less people would require personal cars, which means direct drop in fuel usage per person, even more so in big cities which suffer because high population density requires too much parking space that is never enough.

Mass Public Transport could undo plenty of harm caused knowingly by the auto industry. funding, or in this case legitimizing the industry will not really help as electricity itself is still generated from fossil fuels.

The solution should be LESS consumption, not making excuses for the same consumption, or legitimizing more.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago

There are applications for which mass transit just isn't enough. I expect to see for example some of the disabled using EVs instead of mass transit. Realistically: we need to minimize driving, and electrify what remains.

[-] BlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago

Agreed, also public transport should be more accommodating towards the disabled, it's always such a weird thing that the buses (where i live in) have 0 or 1 "seating spots" for wheelchairs, instead of something modular that is more accomodating.

this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
70 points (88.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5237 readers
469 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS