549
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

JK Rowling has challenged Scotland's new hate crime law in a series of social media posts - inviting police to arrest her if they believe she has committed an offence.

The Harry Potter author, who lives in Edinburgh, described several transgender women as men, including convicted prisoners, trans activists and other public figures.

She said "freedom of speech and belief" was at an end if accurate description of biological sex was outlawed.

Earlier, Scotland's first minister Humza Yousaf said the new law would deal with a "rising tide of hatred".

The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021 creates a new crime of "stirring up hatred" relating to age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or being intersex.

Ms Rowling, who has long been a critic of some trans activism, posted on X on the day the new legislation came into force.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I don't know that I would call telling someone that caring about genocide is something everyone should do is guilt tripping, but okay...

I'm certainly not sure why anyone would think doing something about genocide should be a low priority. Should doing something about Israel's genocide also be a low priority? If not, why do Palestinian lives matter more than trans lives?

[-] sudneo@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

So I hope that’s okay with you.

This is what I call guilt tripping.

Should doing something about Israel’s genocide also be a low priority? If not, why do Palestinian lives matter more than trans lives?

Because Palestinians have been killed in the tens of thousands in a few months, by a single entity (Israel) which is showing precise intent to wipe them from their land. Are you seriously comparing this with things like banning gender affirming care or drag shows (I am using one of your sources) in the States (which I disagree with, but I am not a US citizen)?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Fun how you used one source but not the others. Like the Wikipedia source that explicitly defines why it's genocide.

By the way, since you're not in the states, you might want to know precisely what is happening:

https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/human-rights-campaign-extremists-at-cpac-laid-bare-hatred-at-root-of-vile-legislation-targeting-trans-people

Looks like a precise intent to wipe them out to me.

I guess that's okay since they're "those" people.

[-] sudneo@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

Fun how you used one source but not the others. Like the Wikipedia source that explicitly defines why it’s genocide.

I took one random source from a comment you posted, if you disagree with it, why posting it? There was no wikipedia source, the only wikipedia source you quoted is this, which talks about Nazi Germany, not the ongoing genocide.

If I take https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_genocide as a source, I can clearly read different opinions, including plenty who critique the (ab)use of this term in this particular context. So yes, while all lives matter the same, the current Palestinian genocide is, according to my own personal sensitivity, order of magnitudes more relevant and more worthy of my attention compared to the trans discrimination in US. This means that I decide to devote my finite amount of energy to the former, together with the Ukrainian war and the environmental cause.

By the way, since you’re not in the states, you might want to know precisely what is happening:

So you are actually comparing bigot statements with tens of thousands of people actually blown to bits and starved to death? This to me is almost offensive.

I guess that’s okay since they’re “those” people.

This is a useless straw-man. I explained specifically why I think this problem is hierarchically less important (to me) than other problems. You are again resorting to bad faith/guilt/pity.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

You're right. There's no leap from saying "we should eradicate transgender people" at the official conservative conference and a genocide of transgender people. It's not like people announce who they're going to murder and then murder them or anything.

It was a huge surprise when Israel started killing off Palestinians, wasn't it? No one expected it to happen!

We'll just have to wait until a lot of trans people get murdered, then we can try to do something about it. Who ever heard of preventing something before it gets to mass murder?

[-] sudneo@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

We’ll just have to wait until a lot of trans people get murdered, then we can try to do something about it. Who ever heard of preventing something before it gets to mass murder?

Again, the amount of caring and fighting I can afford is limited. There are probably tens of active conflicts, persecutions, etc. going on in the world, in places I have barely heard, and I can't afford to simply "care" about everything. Exactly like you, I simply decide what matters more to me and fight/care/inform myself about that.

So yes, I believe that if today I have to choose between Palestinians actually being killed and conservative people making hateful statements in US, that might tomorrow result in violence against trans people, I choose the former because I think it has bigger scale, it has bigger impact on the geopolitical balance and it is more urgent. I hope this makes my motivations clear as to why I care about something and not something else.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Why do you have to choose what things you think are wrong with the world and need to be stopped? Why can't you just be in favor of stopping all genocides?

[-] sudneo@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

I don't need to choose what I think is wrong. I have to choose what I can care about and actively fight against.

Hence, I don't care about J.K. Rowling transphobic statements (which is where all of this started), in the sense that I don't actively inform myself on the matter, spend mental energy in deliberating and considering views on the matter and so on.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

So you are actively fighting against Israel's genocide? How are you doing it?

And this goes far beyond Rowling's statements, as I have shown you.

[-] sudneo@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

How are you doing it?

in the sense that I don’t actively inform myself on the matter, spend mental energy in deliberating and considering views on the matter and so on

The "and so on" can include active political activism (such as joining protests), in addition to obviously vote accordingly (Euro-parliament elections are close). It can also include personal boycotts and spreading awareness.

Already informing yourself and forming an opinion requires a lot of energy and effort, so I would say that's the primary way I "actively fight" for causes I care about.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

So if you were in the U.S., you would vote for Republicans despite the call for eradicating trans people and you wouldn't spread awareness of the fact that it has been called for in quite an official way? And you wouldn't even want to be informed about it?

Really?

What if it was black people that they promised to eradicate? Or Hindus? Still okay to vote for them and not worth spreading awareness?

[-] sudneo@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

So if you were in the U.S., you would vote for Republicans despite the call for eradicating trans people and you wouldn’t spread awareness of the fact that it has been called for in quite an official way? And you wouldn’t even want to be informed about it?

????

How did you reach this conclusion?

I am also not here to be interrogated, you told me I "should care" about this whole subject (starting from the Rowling tweets), I said I don't because I can't care about everything and I prioritize according to my sensibility and values. You asked "what do you do", and I have answered you. There is nothing else to say: the trans genocide in the U.S. (if it can be called like this) is something I don't agree with (I have nothing against trans people, I have no problem with people choosing their pronouns, their toilets, their names, their aspect and what to do with their body) but I also don't rank it high enough in the list of causes I care about. I explained what "caring" means. Caring in this context would mean for example reading and educating myself to form opinions about -say- puberty blockers etc. based on age. I don't have the time to form a proper opinion about this, so I don't.

I am sorry if this is a cause that is dear to you and that you wish everyone else would fight, but my whole wife's family is in Ukraine and lives with air raids sirens day in-day out, our planet is on fire and I also need to work and do other stuff in my life. I simply need to choose to what dedicate attention.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Yes, again, I think you, and everyone else, should care about genocides. Because it means fewer genocides. If you can't dedicate any attention to a genocide, maybe you should broaden your focus. Because otherwise, it still sounds like you're okay with some genocide but not other genocide.

[-] sudneo@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

And I, again, disagree. First, I disagree with the premise: so far - based on the sources you used and a cursory review of what I found - I don't find the arguments that define the trans genocide compelling. Second, as a consequence, I see you are back to guilt-tripping as a strategy. No, if I don't care about something doesn't mean I am OK with whatever happens. There are countless of examples probably of things going on in the world I don't have energy or time or will to care about that I am not OK with. So, unless you have some fresh perspective that goes beyond relying on the word "genocide", to argue the relative importance of this matter over others, we are at a deadlock.

Based on the arguments made so far, I stand by my initial position that the trans rights cause - despite I sympathize with it - is not high enough in the priority list to deserve my attention. Even less are the tweets of a celebrity about it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I suppose it's easy to not care about a genocide if you deny the genocide is happening.

Accusing me of guilt-tripping you won't absolve you of genocide denial, sorry.

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
549 points (94.6% liked)

News

23296 readers
3514 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS