194
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 8 months ago

I'm looking at what the polling question actually is. Liberals, kinda by definition, don't want the country to "get back on track" or return to a period of former greatness.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I would agree we're pretty far off the track. Remember when the biggest scandals were presidential blowies and tan suits?

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 8 months ago

How about Watergate? There have always been scandals.

Or on another note, how about when presidential blowies were a scandal, gay people couldn't even get married? The appeal to an idealized past is a conservative thing.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm not saying turn back the clock, I just want politics to stop being so... I mean marjorie taylor greene exists, for fucks sake.

Also let's be real, Watergate is tame in 2024. Hell, PRISM wasn't even as big as Watergate and it was 100x worse.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 months ago

The liberals I know think it’s pretty off track. Specifically, it fell off the rails when Trump got elected.

The track switch probably was thrown back in the 2000 election. We all hoped President Obama was gonna get us back on track.

MAGA wants to revert the us to some racist 1950s version. Violence is basically required to achieve that vision.

Liberals want to put the US back on track to equality, human rights and a secure future (see SCOTUS, for example of how off track the US is). We just don’t think violence is a good way to do take.

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago

I guess I wasn't thinking about it that way, that "on track" could be that Democrats are imagining there was a time when liberal ideals were being actively worked towards. I don't think that's really true, but I now see that someone could think that way.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

So, are you a foreign operative, fascist or tankie?

There's no way educated native English speakers could be as far off in either reading comprehension, or understanding of US politics, as you are.

Half these comments read like the Reddit PsyOps campaigns of 2016, and the vote counts indicate the same.

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago

lmao you're the one who doesn't understand how language is used to manipulate polling and headlines

this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
194 points (94.9% liked)

politics

19244 readers
1873 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS