89
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
89 points (83.5% liked)
politics
19104 readers
2541 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Well then post them! Be the change you want to see
No. The people who have all that grievance and time... They can do that as a show that they're trying to be part of the solution.
Or... They can keep actively working to suppress voter turn out or enthusiasm for other genuinely good candidates. Because all they're pushing is negative press.
You clearly don't care enough about it if you're only willing to complain and not be the change you expect out of others.
It probably takes less to post an article that supports the point you want to make than it does to get into whiney slap fights in the comments, and that's definitely going to be more productive too.
I'm doing one better than them: providing a positive step/solution towards improvement.
What's the point of being in a community when it's always a couple people screaming their discontent? They're getting down voted beyond 0 often, yet they persist?
It means the community has spoken and maybe it's time for someone to step in. If posters can't not just neg all over a community, someone should step in.
It looks odd that no one has.
If that's how you justify your inaction to yourself, so be it. But everyone can see through that justification for what it really is; classic internet complaining about the content other people post with no willingness to change the community outside of dictating to others what should be done.
FTFY.
I agree. If they have this much anger about it, I'd think they'd do something.
As humans, I think, we evolved feelings and emotions because they inform what we do. Ideally. If we sit in the feeling, we're not gaining value. Some feelings (like grief).. there's less a person can do.
But anger, frustration, love, sympathy, all these things, I'd think, are best when they lead us somewhere. Especially if it's productive (which requires other brain systems).
We can do better.
There's no community to create for people who wish people who need a community had one.
So, make your own lemmy instance so you can moderate it.
People are allowed to express their discontent with Biden. Even if it costs 'us' the election.
If you feel there should be more positive Biden stories, post them. You'll have my upvotes.
Generalizing your statement a bit and hoping that's okay. Because I agree generally and specifically.
They are allowed. And I am. And you are. Now we're both hypocrites.
We all disapprove. My point isn't that they shouldn't have the opinion, it's that it seems like they're stopping there.
And by pushing the same incomplete typically negative narrative, it's not helping. It's wallowing. It's feeling as an endpoint.
There is no community to create for people who want to see people who need a community create one.
There is a place for saying, "okay, cool. What now?"
So far, it's mostly complaint. No call to action. It's as if the feeling is the point. And that seems odd.
The main call to action has been to not vote for Biden. There has been that one.