539
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A ringleader in a global monkey torture network exposed by the BBC has been charged by US federal prosecutors.

Michael Macartney, 50, who went by the alias "Torture King", was charged in Virginia with conspiracy to create and distribute animal-crushing videos.

Mr Macartney was one of three key distributors identified by the BBC Eye team during a year-long investigation into sadistic monkey torture groups.

Two women have also been charged in the UK following the investigation.

Warning: This article contains disturbing content

Mr Macartney, a former motorcycle gang member who previously spent time in prison, ran several chat groups for monkey torture enthusiasts from around the world on the encrypted messaging app Telegram.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Animals are not food, they have a right to live like anyone else. Hunting is cruel and factory farming is cruel, and all the nonsense of pasture raised animal agriculture is also cruel, and all the carnists mental gymnastics about how one is ok and the other is not is absurd. There's no good reason we should murder animals.

[-] gimpchrist@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Everything on this planet is food ... including us. Every single thing on this planet eventually is food for something else. It's not cruelty, it's not evil, it's not barbarism, it's not wrong, it is life on planet Earth. Eating food does not have to come with torture. There is a gigantic difference and it is important to make that distinction, otherwise we will rip ourselves and this planet to pieces.

[-] Sizzler@slrpnk.net 0 points 7 months ago

The gigantic difference is you are aware you are hurting animals and could be a better person.

[-] gimpchrist@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

I'm not hurting anything. And I won't be hurting myself by not eating food if it comes down to it. I am part of the Earth and I will participate while I'm here.

[-] Sizzler@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago

Keep lying to yourself or go watch the conditions animals are killed in, your choice.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Animals literally are food.

All animals are. And we too, are animals.

For what, that's a different question. Literally every living thing gets consumed by other living things as a part of nature. Well, putting aside "artificial" things like being blasted to dust in a furnace, and even then, you can be used to fertilise plants, meaning another living thing is consuming you.

Just how naive do you have to be to think that nothing should ever die, or if it does, that it should never be consumed by another living thing? That's illogical and crazy.

So... you would rather destroy whole environments, entire species, than accept that hunting is necessary? Because it is. It's necessary for the environment and it saves lives (because overpopulated deer cause more accidents because of constant migration and just the sheer amount of them.)

You don't understand what the word "murder" means.

This sort of absolutism is exactly why veganism has such a poor rep.

It's clearly a personal thing for you. This is part of your identity, but not something you've actually researched or thought about. It shows from the way you use expressions like "carnist mental gymnastics" while not being able to accept literally unchangeable facts of nature and crying that a deer who lived in the wild was equally tortured as a livestock animal who may have lived their entire lives without being able to even turn around in their cage.

You're about as good for animals and equally ironic as PETA.

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

I don't think I've ever read a stupider bunch of nonsense in my life. Animals are not food.

[-] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago
[-] Sizzler@slrpnk.net 0 points 7 months ago

Other animals, but they don't call what they eat "food". Do you understand or do I need to use pictures to explain to you?

[-] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Actually if you think you are making a valid coherent point please go into further detail. As I see it what they call or don't call what they eat doesn't change what it fundamentally is. Shark food is animals. Translate that into shark if you like but the meaning doesn't change.

[-] Sizzler@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago

Sharks don't have the same self-reflective mechanism we do, I mean they recognise we aren't very good food but other than that they don't think "should I eat this?".

Simply put we do have the capacity for that and should maybe act on it.

[-] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

What does that have to do with what constitutes food? Food is what is eaten for sustenance. Sharks eat animals. No they don't reflect on the morality of it but that has nothing to do with the reality that sharks eat animals for food. Animals are food. When you talk all carnivores and parasites and such out of feeding on animals then we can say that animals are not food. Us having the capacity and the will to be morally selective about our choice of food doesn't make animals not food.

[-] Sizzler@slrpnk.net 0 points 7 months ago

It does and I'm sick of people pretending it doesn't.

[-] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

It does? It does what?

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

I don't even believe you read it, tbh.

Please name a foodstuff that wasn't originally from a living organism. I'll wait.

this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
539 points (99.1% liked)

News

23320 readers
3125 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS