196
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Business groups claim hard-fought $20 hourly wage victory will cause reduced hours, layoffs and price hikes – critics say otherwise

As fast-food workers celebrated a pivotal wage increase to $20 an hour in California last week, an old economic debate was awakened by business groups and others claiming the increase will wind up hurting workers through reduced hours and layoffs, hurt customers with price hikes, and harm the franchise owners of fast food restaurants.

Their critics are not so sure.

The hard-fought wage increase to $20 an hour from California’s current minimum wage, $16 an hour, was a compromise to initial demands of $22 an hour with annual wage increases. Representatives of fast-food workers and the fast food industry came to a deal to avoid what would have been a costly ballot initiative over the passage and signing of the California fast food sector bill last year.

“Frontline workers like me organized, went on strike, and fought to pass a historic law that raises our wages and gives us a seat at table with some of the biggest fast food corporations in the world,” said Anjelica Hernandez, a McDonald’s worker in Los Angeles for nearly 20 years. “Even though we are the engine of a billion-dollar industry, too many of us struggle to keep with rent, our bills and the rising cost of living.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] takeda@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Business groups claim hard-fought $20 hourly wage victory will cause reduced hours, layoffs and price hikes – critics say otherwise

If someone says that this will reduce hours, and cause layoffs, you know that they are bullshitting.

Why would they add to minimum wage increase and reduce their profit? Might as well declare bankruptcy.

As for prices, they usually are set not by how much it costs to produce something, but how much a customer will pay. They might increase prices if they are below the cost of production, but again they are dictated by the customer. If they can't the business would go bankrupt.

They didn't mention about going out of business, so it is kind of clear that this is a lot of hot air and they really just comparing about earning less.

There's one thing I didn't mentioned related to employees. It is automation that could replace them. The thing with that is that whenever they can, those companies would do that anyway.

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee -1 points 7 months ago

Workers aren't choosing their hours though so yes they can have reduced hours. The supervisor might also be told to do with less manpower. Its like how when you go to a small boba or coffee shop and there is 1 person doing everything.

As for automation that is almost 100% going to happen and is already happening. From automated server to burger flipper to drive thru attendant it's all being tried.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

You're talking as if they weren't working with minimum staff already. If they could cut staff more (even without this change) they would do so already.

As for automation that is almost 100% going to happen and is already happening. From automated server to burger flipper to drive thru attendant it's all being tried.

Yeah, but again, this would happen with or without minimum wage increase. For the owners even if they would have to pay $6/hour that would still make them complain that it is too much.

What politicians should work on is to introduce tax on automation, and all the income from it should go toward UBI.

this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
196 points (99.0% liked)

News

23311 readers
3621 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS