288
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rizoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 7 months ago

All fandoms on the Internet need to live by this. Stop being so mad about shit.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 46 points 7 months ago

I like Stan Lee's line. A fanboy asked him who would win a fight between two particular characters.

"Whoever the writer decides would win."

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 8 points 7 months ago

I love subverting expectations, so if I was writing a battle between two big, popular characters I'd have a 3rd character that I like come in and steal the victory.

[-] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago
[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 10 points 7 months ago

in a blood stained sweater of course

[-] abbadon420@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

A blood, sweat and oil stained wifebeater

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 7 months ago

That would be quite the ultimate showdown.

[-] x4740N@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

I dislike cannon contradictions because they are basically headcannon rewrites by the writers ignoring cannon

I understand that mistakes do sometimes happen in writing where they miss a cannon detail but those are mistakes and mistakes aren't intentional

If someone wants to write a new star trek story there is plenty of rich cannon already there to craft into a story or a new story could be made following trek universe rules to add to the cannon

[-] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 15 points 7 months ago

A lot of what fans think is canon just isn’t anyway. Most so-called ‘violations’ are just different interpretations of what was shown on screen decades ago.

There’s an entire list out there of all the headcanon that fans hold up that just isn’t supported by what’s on screen.

Writers shouldn’t be held to fan interpretations of what they thought they saw in TOS or TNG.

In other words, fans who clearly live in glass canon houses shouldn’t throw stones.

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 12 points 7 months ago

I remember reading a rant on reddit (or something, maybe it was one of those TV Show fact sites) about people who were convinced there was some throwaway line in Voyager that implied you needed matter tanks to store matter for replication.

Turns out the line they were talking about had to do with the matter/anti-matter tanks for the warp drive.

Sometimes fans are just dumb and completely reinterpret canon as whatever they want it to be anyways.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 10 points 7 months ago

TOS and TNG aren't even consistent in their own shows. Gene just wrote whatever sriry he wanted to tell and ran with it.

[-] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 8 points 7 months ago

Well there’s that too.

Gene found it totally cool for previously unmentioned immediate family to show up out of the blue, but fans can’t help going into spasms when things not previously mentioned show up.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

IM MAD BECAUSE BEVERLY FUCKED A GHOST AND HAD A WET DREAM BECAUSE OF HER DEAD GRANDMAS SEX STORIES

this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
288 points (91.6% liked)

Risa

6900 readers
32 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS