'Ate Seagulls : okmatewanker

[+] MBM 4 points 7 months ago

[deleted]

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

As if the username and account age didn't give away your redditorness enough

[-] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

That is what the guy would "of" said, yeah.

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 1 points 7 months ago

“Shouldn’t of” is a way of saying “I’m a basic dickhead who doesn’t care for your woke opinions, up to and including grammar”

[-] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Huh, TIL

[-] letsgo@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

It's also regularly confused with a way of saying "I went to a school with 'progressive' (read: stupid) ideas about spelling, where the 'teachers' would say dumb shit like 'how would you spell it at home?'"

Fortunately I missed all that nonsense and regularly had classes on the correct use of and distinction between they're, their and there; two, too and to; bear and bare; should have vs should of; i.e. vs e.g., etc.

[+] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de -17 points 7 months ago

language changes grandpa, get with the times

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Language changes but they should still make sense right? "Shouldn't of" makes no sense.

[-] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Especially when the opportunity for a cool ass double abbreviation is right there. Shouldn't've missed the chance.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

KAhfkoa azflyhy kkjsdi osit?

Language changes, granpa. Get with the times.